Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sandensea

(23,436 posts)
2. Easy. They control most of the federal judges.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 01:59 PM
Aug 2017

The Panama Papers case against Macri, as you may have heard, was recently dropped as well (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eldestapeweb.com%2Fpanama-papers-la-camara-federal-cerro-la-causa-lavado-dinero-contra-macri-n31625).

This despite hard proof found by ICIJ journalists that his name is on at least 50 offshore accounts worth at least $55 million between them - all undeclared (another illegality in itself). He still has tax evasion charges pending - but even there, the courts are acting very "confused" despite the mountain of Panama Papers and other evidence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Argentina's Macri reveale...»Reply #2