Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mopinko

(73,877 posts)
5. probably is connected. vaguely recall
Sat Jun 15, 2019, 04:09 PM
Jun 2019

that the skins were thought to have come from defeated enemies.

i have this notion that art is necessary for religion to grow. that it is necessary to embody an idea in a tangible way to explain an intangible.
old white male archeologists always attributed early art to worship, but i am positive that is bass ackwards.
i do think it was pretty quickly appropriated to weave origin stories, at least.

i have used the jaguar as an example of how i think it works-
artist- i have captured the power of the jaguar. see?
citizen- wow! i have never seen anything like that before.
a- it carries the power of the cat.
c- well, it sure is amazing.

etc, etc. a new piece of art is an amazing thing today. imagine the first piece of art a whole town had ever seen?

makes me wonder if they wandered into a sort of rabbit hole like religious insanity.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Human Skull Trophies Help...»Reply #5