Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latin America
In reply to the discussion: Cuban official asks Biden's gov't to reconsider sanctions [View all]Judi Lynn
(164,163 posts)2. U.S.-Cuba: Secrets of the 'Havana Syndrome'
Published: Feb 10, 2021
Briefing Book #740
Edited by Peter Kornbluh
Declassified State Department review faults lack of senior leadership, systemic disorganization in response to unsolved health episodes
Tillerson State Department failed to conduct risk/benefit assessment before reducing Embassy staff
Report of Accountability Review Board confirms CIA closure of its Havana Station in September 2017
ARB investigation cited similar health incidents involving U.S. personnel in China and two other countries
Categories:
Intelligence and Espionage
Science and Technology
Regions:
Cuba and Caribbean
Project:
Cuba
Intelligence and Espionage
Science and Technology
Regions:
Cuba and Caribbean
Project:
Cuba
Washington D.C., February 10, 2021 The Trump administrations response to the mysterious health episodes experienced by intelligence and diplomatic personnel in Havana, Cuba, in late 2016 and 2017 was plagued by mismanagement, poor leadership, lack of coordination, and a failure to follow established procedures, according to a formerly secret internal State Department review posted today by the National Security Archive. The Department of States response to these incidents was characterized by a lack of senior leadership, ineffective communications, and systemic disorganization, states the executive summary of the report, compiled by an internal Accountability Review Board (ARB) after a four-month investigation in 2018. No senior official was ever designated as having overall responsibility, the report noted in a thinly veiled indictment of then-Secretary of State Rex Tillersons role, which resulted in many of the other issues this report presents.
The report, stamped SECRET/NOFORN, was provided to Tillersons successor, Mike Pompeo, on June 7, 2018. A full eighteen months after the unexplained afflictions were first reported, the ARB conceded that what happened in Havana remained shrouded in mystery. The mechanism for the cause of the injuries is currently unknown. We do not know the motive behind these incidents, when they actually commenced, or who did it, the report states. We do know that USG, and Canadian diplomatic community members, were injured, but we do not know how. We do not know what happened, when it happened, who did it, or why.
The National Security Archive obtained the heavily redacted ARB report, titled Havana, Cuba, via a Freedom of Information Act request. The State Department has been processing and periodically releasing records related to the so-called Havana Syndrome pursuant to a FOIA lawsuit filed by the James Madison Project, a public-interest firm representing a group of Embassy officials and family members who were posted in Havana.
The ARB report sheds considerable light on the Havana Syndrome history, said Peter Kornbluh, who directs the Archives Cuba Documentation Project. But it does not solve the enduring mystery of what happened in Cuba. The clues to resolving that mystery, he noted, are likely to be found in still-secret State Department, CIA, FBI, and Pentagon records, which remain immediately relevant as the Biden administration considers restoring Embassy staffing to full operations.
. . .
** Embassy Staff Reduction: Secretary Tillersons dramatic decision in late September 2017 to reduce the Havana Embassy staff by more than 60 percent and effectively shutter the U.S. Consulate appeared to have violated normal operating practice, the Accountability Board concluded. The decision to draw down the staff in Havana does not appear to have followed standard Department of State procedures and was neither preceded nor followed by any formal analysis of the risks and benefits of continued physical presence of U.S. government employees in Havana, according to the report. The Board tried, and failed, to obtain an explanation for why the basic risk/benefit analysis was not conducted. In a heavily censored section titled Risk Benefit Analysis or Lack Thereof, the report states: The State Department has had such a process for a number of years, however, no such analysis has been done to date (June 7, 2018) for Cuba. Of the many Department leaders interviewed by the Board, no one could explain why this has not happened, except to suggest that [redacted]a possible reference to the influence of the CIAs withdrawal on Tillersons decision to reduce the embassy to a skeletal staff, or to political pressure from Florida Senator Marco Rubio on President Trump to seize the opportunity to roll back the Obama administrations opening of full diplomatic relations with Cuba.
More:
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cuba/2021-02-10/secrets-havana-syndrome-how-trumps-state-department-cia-mishandled-mysterious-maladies-cuba
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations