Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
7. That's absurd
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 08:20 AM
Jan 2013
"The National Assembly has the power to grant the President leave for 90 says, and extend...

...to another 90 days. It's been mentioned numerous times in these discussions."


He's not the president anymore. His term is over.

It doesn't matter whether the 180 days provision is specified by the Constitution or was enacted by the National Assembly. It is THE LAW OF THE LAND. Not everything that our federal government does is specified in the U.S. Constitution (by a long shot). Legislatures INTERPRET the Constitution and WRITE LAWS accordingly

But it is, specifically, in the constitution. The constitution wasn't vague on the matter. It anticipated exactly this situation and provided a very precise solution.

I only skimmed the rest of what you wrote, because it is not relevant. The constitution has a precise and exact mechanism for this, and the Chavistas chose to ignore it. You don't care because you are an "ends justify the means" person.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»The Real News network's e...»Reply #7