Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists: "So much to do, so little done, such things to be." April 20-22, 2012 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)31. Dream of Taxpayer Bailout Profit Is Just That
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-19/hope-for-treasury-bailout-profits-rests-on-fuzzy-math.html
The U.S. Treasury Department wants the public to believe the governments bailouts of the financial sector might make money for taxpayers. Its easy to see why.
If the government could show an overall profit, the implication would be that bailouts must be a good thing. Put aside the moral hazard they create, by encouraging reckless behavior. Never mind that the countrys largest too-big-to-fail banks are larger today than when the financial crisis began in 2007. The leaders who pulled off this amazing feat would deserve our praise, and everything will have worked out for the best -- or so goes this line of thought.
Whatever logic there is to this reasoning falls apart, however, if the prospect of future gains is false. And sure enough, it probably is.
The Treasury Department a week ago released its latest cost estimates for the governments numerous crisis-response programs. Overall, the government is now expected to at least break even on its financial stability programs and may realize a positive return, the report said. Unfortunately this conclusion rests heavily on wishful thinking and creative accounting, which becomes obvious when you dig into the reports footnotes.
The U.S. Treasury Department wants the public to believe the governments bailouts of the financial sector might make money for taxpayers. Its easy to see why.
If the government could show an overall profit, the implication would be that bailouts must be a good thing. Put aside the moral hazard they create, by encouraging reckless behavior. Never mind that the countrys largest too-big-to-fail banks are larger today than when the financial crisis began in 2007. The leaders who pulled off this amazing feat would deserve our praise, and everything will have worked out for the best -- or so goes this line of thought.
Whatever logic there is to this reasoning falls apart, however, if the prospect of future gains is false. And sure enough, it probably is.
The Treasury Department a week ago released its latest cost estimates for the governments numerous crisis-response programs. Overall, the government is now expected to at least break even on its financial stability programs and may realize a positive return, the report said. Unfortunately this conclusion rests heavily on wishful thinking and creative accounting, which becomes obvious when you dig into the reports footnotes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weekend Economists: "So much to do, so little done, such things to be." April 20-22, 2012 [View all]
Demeter
Apr 2012
OP
$4 For a Gallon of Water? The Dream of Monsanto and Other Corporations Wanting To Privatize Water
Demeter
Apr 2012
#21
Freedom from a Dead-End Life: True Liberty Means Defeating the RW's Nightmare Vision for America
Demeter
Apr 2012
#26
CIA Claims Release of its History of the Bay of Pigs Debacle Would “Confuse the Public.”
Demeter
Apr 2012
#35
Homeland Security's 'Pre-Crime' Screening Will Never Work (TO TAKE IT BEYOND REASON)
Demeter
Apr 2012
#48
"We need to forge a movement to save the planet and jobs at the same time"
bread_and_roses
Apr 2012
#66