Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Tuesday, 24 April 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)46. How Pete Peterson is driving the fiscal consensus By Felix Salmon
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/20/how-pete-peterson-is-driving-the-fiscal-consensus/
Trudy Lieberman has a good post at CJR on the surprisingly broad consensus around the need to reduce the fiscal deficit in general, and to take aim at Social Security in particular. Social Security, she writes, is the one issue on which the electorate is not divided but that hasnt stopped a bipartisan group of Washington grandees from preaching doom whenever it is brought up.
More generally, the idea of fiscal responsibility seems to have become as American as motherhood and apple pie both parties preach it, and say the other guys are the profligate ones. The group of people saying hey, we print our own money, interest rates are at zero, inflation is not an issue, the corporate sector isnt borrowing, there are a thousand more important things to worry about right now, why on earth is everybody worried about the deficit all of a sudden is in a decided minority.
The obsession about fiscal prudence is a new phenomenon, and can be dated, pretty much, to 2008, when Blackstone went public and Pete Peterson took his billion dollars in proceeds and decided to use it to found the Peter G Peterson Foundation. Wherever fiscal prudence is preached, Petersons money can nearly always be found...
Reasonable people can differ on the question of how important it is to balance the budget, but I think its fair to say that there are lot of screamingly important issues, from endemic long-term unemployment to global nuclear proliferation, which arent getting a fraction of the attention that fiscal policy is getting. Which only goes to show, I think, just how powerful Pete Petersons targeted millions can be.
Trudy Lieberman has a good post at CJR on the surprisingly broad consensus around the need to reduce the fiscal deficit in general, and to take aim at Social Security in particular. Social Security, she writes, is the one issue on which the electorate is not divided but that hasnt stopped a bipartisan group of Washington grandees from preaching doom whenever it is brought up.
More generally, the idea of fiscal responsibility seems to have become as American as motherhood and apple pie both parties preach it, and say the other guys are the profligate ones. The group of people saying hey, we print our own money, interest rates are at zero, inflation is not an issue, the corporate sector isnt borrowing, there are a thousand more important things to worry about right now, why on earth is everybody worried about the deficit all of a sudden is in a decided minority.
The obsession about fiscal prudence is a new phenomenon, and can be dated, pretty much, to 2008, when Blackstone went public and Pete Peterson took his billion dollars in proceeds and decided to use it to found the Peter G Peterson Foundation. Wherever fiscal prudence is preached, Petersons money can nearly always be found...
Reasonable people can differ on the question of how important it is to balance the budget, but I think its fair to say that there are lot of screamingly important issues, from endemic long-term unemployment to global nuclear proliferation, which arent getting a fraction of the attention that fiscal policy is getting. Which only goes to show, I think, just how powerful Pete Petersons targeted millions can be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New York Times Details Widespread Bribery in Wal-Mart Mexico and Top Executive Coverup
Demeter
Apr 2012
#33
That depends on whether one learns anything that can be applied to the real world
Demeter
Apr 2012
#17
You sound like an old fuddy duddy! There are huge numbers of students pursuing "practical" careers
rfranklin
Apr 2012
#24
Apple Reports Results for Q2 2012: $11.6 Billion Profit on $39.2 Billion in Revenue
hamerfan
Apr 2012
#54