STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 16 May 2012

[KoKo]

39. "...Sometimes God Smiles on Us..." /Goldman Lawyer accidently releases damning papers--Matt Taibbi

( SMWers might remember when "Overstock.com" sued Goldman for trying to drive it's company into the ground. Their lawsuit was dismissed and the owner was villified all over the web as a conspiracy nut and a creep. Matt Taibbi's article links to the released documents where Goldman goes after Overstock by threatening witnesses, lobbying heavily (paying money and threatening) and gloats about their success. The Vampire Squid is like "The MOB" if you read pages 14-16 of the documents linked to from Taibbi's article...it's chilling what Goldman does.)

-----------


Published on Wednesday, May 16, 2012 by Rolling Stone

Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
by Matt Taibbi

It doesn’t happen often, but sometimes God smiles on us. Last week, he smiled on investigative reporters everywhere, when the lawyers for Goldman, Sachs slipped on one whopper of a legal banana peel, inadvertently delivering some of the bank’s darker secrets into the hands of the public.

The lawyers for Goldman and Bank of America/Merrill Lynch have been involved in a legal battle for some time – primarily with the retail giant Overstock.com, but also with Rolling Stone, the Economist, Bloomberg, and the New York Times. The banks have been fighting us to keep sealed certain documents that surfaced in the discovery process of an ultimately unsuccessful lawsuit filed by Overstock against the banks.

Last week, in response to an Overstock.com motion to unseal certain documents, the banks’ lawyers, apparently accidentally, filed an unredacted version of Overstock’s motion as an exhibit in their declaration of opposition to that motion. In doing so, they inadvertently entered into the public record a sort of greatest-hits selection of the very material they’ve been fighting for years to keep sealed.

I contacted Morgan Lewis, the firm that represents Goldman in this matter, earlier today, but they haven’t commented as of yet. I wonder if the poor lawyer who FUBARred this thing has already had his organs harvested; his panic is almost palpable in the air. It is both terrible and hilarious to contemplate. The bank has spent a fortune in legal fees trying to keep this material out of the public eye, and here one of their own lawyers goes and dumps it out on the street.

The lawsuit between Overstock and the banks concerned a phenomenon called naked short-selling, a kind of high-finance counterfeiting that, especially prior to the introduction of new regulations in 2008, short-sellers could use to artificially depress the value of the stocks they’ve bet against. The subject of naked short-selling is a) highly technical, and b) very controversial on Wall Street, with many pundits in the financial press for years treating the phenomenon as the stuff of myths and conspiracy theories.

Now, however, through the magic of this unredacted document, the public will be able to see for itself what the banks’ attitudes are not just toward the “mythical” practice of naked short selling (hint: they volubly confess to the activity, in writing), but toward regulations and laws in general.

Much More (but check out the document pages Matt links when you have time...SCARY...at:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/05/16-0