Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH, Wednesday, December 21, 2011. [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)40. Can We Afford Medicare? By James Kwak
http://baselinescenario.com/2011/12/20/can-we-afford-medicare/
The conventional wisdom, repeated endlessly by the so-called serious people, is that we cant afford traditional Medicare and hence it has to be radically overhauled (see Ryan-Wyden for the latest round). But Ive never seen a convincing argument for why we cant afford traditional Medicare. Yes, costs are rising as a share of GDP. But in principle, to make the case that we have to reform the program, you would have to argue that revenues cant rise enough to keep pacewhich in most cases, just shows that you dont want revenues to rise enough.
More specifically, you have to know how big the Medicare deficit is and how fast it is rising. By my calculations, relying mainly on the 2011 Medicare Trustees report, the deficit was 1.7% of GDP in 2010 and will be 3.0% of GDP in 2040. So the argument that we cant afford traditional Medicare relies on the proposition that this 1.3% of GDP is the straw that will break Americas fiscal back. Needless to say, this is nonsense, especially since other tax revenues not related to Medicare will be rising over the same time period, at least under current law. For all the details and sources, see my latest Atlantic column: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/12/the-great-medicare-scare-of-2011/250282/
Medicare has its problems. But we have choices.
The conventional wisdom, repeated endlessly by the so-called serious people, is that we cant afford traditional Medicare and hence it has to be radically overhauled (see Ryan-Wyden for the latest round). But Ive never seen a convincing argument for why we cant afford traditional Medicare. Yes, costs are rising as a share of GDP. But in principle, to make the case that we have to reform the program, you would have to argue that revenues cant rise enough to keep pacewhich in most cases, just shows that you dont want revenues to rise enough.
More specifically, you have to know how big the Medicare deficit is and how fast it is rising. By my calculations, relying mainly on the 2011 Medicare Trustees report, the deficit was 1.7% of GDP in 2010 and will be 3.0% of GDP in 2040. So the argument that we cant afford traditional Medicare relies on the proposition that this 1.3% of GDP is the straw that will break Americas fiscal back. Needless to say, this is nonsense, especially since other tax revenues not related to Medicare will be rising over the same time period, at least under current law. For all the details and sources, see my latest Atlantic column: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/12/the-great-medicare-scare-of-2011/250282/
Medicare has its problems. But we have choices.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top House Democrat demands explanation of penalties for late foreclosures (FROM NOVEMBER)
Demeter
Dec 2011
#5
"Corzine. You will pay the JP morgue or swim with the fish" signed, Jamie. n/t
Po_d Mainiac
Dec 2011
#18
UK slides further into recessionary territory as confidence hits three-year low
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#14
Why Are We Forced to Worship at the Feet of 'Mythical' Financial Markets Controlled by the Elite?
xchrom
Dec 2011
#20
it's not loading the link correctly -- why i don't know -- but it's at alternet. nt
xchrom
Dec 2011
#21
Bill Black's Handy Guide to Bankster Fraud, From 'Small Fraudulent Fry' to 'Septic Tank Scum'
xchrom
Dec 2011
#26
Ew, does anyone have the Chutzpah required to post the, "It's Working" piece about Chopper Ben?
Hugin
Dec 2011
#36
Are You Happy That Your Tax Dollars are Going to Crush #OWS and Other Occupations?
Demeter
Dec 2011
#32
They can always opt to share some of that money, which is making them so miserable.
Hugin
Dec 2011
#50
Tom Miller Can’t Even Lie Well Anymore: No Deal By Christmas, Banks Up Demands As AGs Leave Table
Demeter
Dec 2011
#51
FHFA’s DeMarco Considering Backdoor Bankruptcy Principal Modification Program for Freddie and Freddi
Demeter
Dec 2011
#55
i would say the eu is nailing down the procedures for moving wealth to the already wealthy.
xchrom
Dec 2011
#73
The Germans in particular are in the ordoliberalism school, which rejects Hayek and the Austrians
FarCenter
Dec 2011
#90