Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH, Wednesday, December 21, 2011. [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)65. Banking: the gift that keeps on giving – just not to you
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2011/dec/20/banking-gift-keeps-giving
Christmas came early this year for four former executives of Washington Mutual (WaMu), a large US bank that failed in the autumn of 2008. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) had brought a lawsuit against the four for actions that included taking huge financial risks while "knowing that the real estate market was in a 'bubble'". The FDIC sought to recover $900m (£575m), but the executives have just settled for $64m, almost all of which will be paid by their insurers; their out-of-pockets costs are estimated at just $400,000.
To be sure, the executives lost their jobs and now must drop claims for additional compensation. But, according to the FDIC, the four still earned more than $95m from January 2005 through September 2008. So they are walking away with a great deal of cash. This is what happens when financial executives are compensated for "return on equity" unadjusted for risk. The executives get the upside when things go well; when the downside risks materialise, they lose nothing (or close to it).
At the same time, their actions and similar actions by other bankers are directly responsible for both the run-up in housing prices and the damaging collapse that followed. That collapse has impacted non-bankers in many negative ways, including through the loss of more than 8 million jobs.
It is also leading to austerity taxes are increasing and government spending is falling at the local and state level around the country. A difficult fiscal conversation still lies ahead at the federal level, but cuts and contractions of various types seem likely.
Christmas came early this year for four former executives of Washington Mutual (WaMu), a large US bank that failed in the autumn of 2008. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) had brought a lawsuit against the four for actions that included taking huge financial risks while "knowing that the real estate market was in a 'bubble'". The FDIC sought to recover $900m (£575m), but the executives have just settled for $64m, almost all of which will be paid by their insurers; their out-of-pockets costs are estimated at just $400,000.
To be sure, the executives lost their jobs and now must drop claims for additional compensation. But, according to the FDIC, the four still earned more than $95m from January 2005 through September 2008. So they are walking away with a great deal of cash. This is what happens when financial executives are compensated for "return on equity" unadjusted for risk. The executives get the upside when things go well; when the downside risks materialise, they lose nothing (or close to it).
At the same time, their actions and similar actions by other bankers are directly responsible for both the run-up in housing prices and the damaging collapse that followed. That collapse has impacted non-bankers in many negative ways, including through the loss of more than 8 million jobs.
It is also leading to austerity taxes are increasing and government spending is falling at the local and state level around the country. A difficult fiscal conversation still lies ahead at the federal level, but cuts and contractions of various types seem likely.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top House Democrat demands explanation of penalties for late foreclosures (FROM NOVEMBER)
Demeter
Dec 2011
#5
"Corzine. You will pay the JP morgue or swim with the fish" signed, Jamie. n/t
Po_d Mainiac
Dec 2011
#18
UK slides further into recessionary territory as confidence hits three-year low
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#14
Why Are We Forced to Worship at the Feet of 'Mythical' Financial Markets Controlled by the Elite?
xchrom
Dec 2011
#20
it's not loading the link correctly -- why i don't know -- but it's at alternet. nt
xchrom
Dec 2011
#21
Bill Black's Handy Guide to Bankster Fraud, From 'Small Fraudulent Fry' to 'Septic Tank Scum'
xchrom
Dec 2011
#26
Ew, does anyone have the Chutzpah required to post the, "It's Working" piece about Chopper Ben?
Hugin
Dec 2011
#36
Are You Happy That Your Tax Dollars are Going to Crush #OWS and Other Occupations?
Demeter
Dec 2011
#32
They can always opt to share some of that money, which is making them so miserable.
Hugin
Dec 2011
#50
Tom Miller Can’t Even Lie Well Anymore: No Deal By Christmas, Banks Up Demands As AGs Leave Table
Demeter
Dec 2011
#51
FHFA’s DeMarco Considering Backdoor Bankruptcy Principal Modification Program for Freddie and Freddi
Demeter
Dec 2011
#55
i would say the eu is nailing down the procedures for moving wealth to the already wealthy.
xchrom
Dec 2011
#73
The Germans in particular are in the ordoliberalism school, which rejects Hayek and the Austrians
FarCenter
Dec 2011
#90