Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 5 July 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)39. JPMorgan probed over possible power market manipulation
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL2E8I31V020120703
U.S. energy regulators have subpoenaed JPMorgan Chase & Co to produce 25 internal emails as part of an investigation into whether the bank manipulated electricity markets in California and the Midwest. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has recently stepped up its efforts to end manipulation of U.S. power markets, filed a petition in federal court on Monday to require the bank to produce emails from 2010 and 2011 as part of a formal investigation into the bank's power trading. News of the subpoena follows a series of more advanced probes of other big Wall Street banks and a record $245 million penalty against Constellation Energy that have sent shudders through electric markets this year, rekindling memories of the California power crisis and Enron melt-down a decade ago.
The inquiry also comes at a delicate moment for JPMorgan, already facing losses from its disastrous "London
Whale" derivative trades that could amount to as much as $6 billion. FERC does not normally disclose investigations, but it chose to subpoena JPMorgan after the bank claimed emails - some between commodities chief Blythe Masters and head of principal commodity investments Francis Dunleavy - were protected by attorney-client privilege, which the regulator disputes.
FERC said it is also looking at whether the bank has tried to stall the investigation by not engaging in truthful
communications with the commission. The inquiry follows complaints from grid operators in California and the Midwest in 2011 that JPMorgan's traders may have bid up electricity prices by more than $73 million. FERC
has not yet found if there was any wrongdoing.
EMAIL CHAIN
At the center of the subpoena is a dispute over client-attorney privilege. Court papers and exhibits show that
JPMorgan repeatedly told FERC's Office of Enforcement that 53 emails the regulator sought from the bank were protected. JPMorgan produced 20 emails in May after FERC told the bank it intended to seek judicial review of the emails. The bank produced another eight emails in June, the court papers said.
MORE--AND IT'S GOOD NEWS, I THINK!
U.S. energy regulators have subpoenaed JPMorgan Chase & Co to produce 25 internal emails as part of an investigation into whether the bank manipulated electricity markets in California and the Midwest. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has recently stepped up its efforts to end manipulation of U.S. power markets, filed a petition in federal court on Monday to require the bank to produce emails from 2010 and 2011 as part of a formal investigation into the bank's power trading. News of the subpoena follows a series of more advanced probes of other big Wall Street banks and a record $245 million penalty against Constellation Energy that have sent shudders through electric markets this year, rekindling memories of the California power crisis and Enron melt-down a decade ago.
The inquiry also comes at a delicate moment for JPMorgan, already facing losses from its disastrous "London
Whale" derivative trades that could amount to as much as $6 billion. FERC does not normally disclose investigations, but it chose to subpoena JPMorgan after the bank claimed emails - some between commodities chief Blythe Masters and head of principal commodity investments Francis Dunleavy - were protected by attorney-client privilege, which the regulator disputes.
"The investigation focuses on JPMorgan bidding practices that may have been designed to manipulate the California and Midwest electricity markets," FERC lawyers said in the subpoena. "Any such improper payments to generators are ultimately borne by the households, businesses, and government entities that are the end consumers of electricity."
FERC said it is also looking at whether the bank has tried to stall the investigation by not engaging in truthful
communications with the commission. The inquiry follows complaints from grid operators in California and the Midwest in 2011 that JPMorgan's traders may have bid up electricity prices by more than $73 million. FERC
has not yet found if there was any wrongdoing.
"We have been responding to a FERC investigation into certain activities in our federally approved power business," JPMorgan spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli said in an email. "We stress that this investigation is ongoing and that no conclusions have been reached or findings adjudicated. We welcome the court's assistance in resolving this dispute over documents," Zuccarelli said.
EMAIL CHAIN
At the center of the subpoena is a dispute over client-attorney privilege. Court papers and exhibits show that
JPMorgan repeatedly told FERC's Office of Enforcement that 53 emails the regulator sought from the bank were protected. JPMorgan produced 20 emails in May after FERC told the bank it intended to seek judicial review of the emails. The bank produced another eight emails in June, the court papers said.
"A party that has knowingly and repeatedly assured a federal agency that documents are privileged, when there was no good faith basis for a privilege claim, is entitled to no credibility when it makes similar privilege claims about other documents,"FERC said in the court filing.
MORE--AND IT'S GOOD NEWS, I THINK!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Got to hand it to "Chimpanzee Politics," and beta-males following the alpha-male.
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2012
#2
True enough. The human brain is more evolved than the chimpanzee brain, but all of that extra space
TrollBuster9090
Jul 2012
#53