Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 9 July 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)36. Oakland City Council Demands Debt-Swap Renegotiation With Goldman Sachs
http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/07/06/oakland-city-council-demands-debt-swap-renegotiation-with-goldman-sachs/
If the Libor scandal did end up hurting local governments to a large degree, you can just add that to the list. Local governments have been easy marks for the financial industry during the last decade, engaging in all kinds of interest rate-swap deals and other vehicles for financing operations. When they turn sour, the locals, not the banks, end up holding the bag.
One city is trying to flip that script. The Oakland City Council unanimously voted to break off a deal with Goldman Sachs, using the citys leverage to try and get out of the deal that is hurting their taxpayers. The issue concerns a familiar interest rate-swap deal, which financial institutions sell to cities as a way to hedge against higher interest rates, but which have cost cities millions by locking in higher borrowing costs.
The council voted to demand Goldman Sachs to negotiate with the city to get out of a 1998 interest rate-swap deal without having to pay a $15 million penalty. Currently, because of the locked-in rates, the deal is costing the city $4 million a year. Oakland estimates they have lost $17.5 million on the deal so far, and even though the underlying bonds were sold back four years ago, because of that $15 million penalty, the city will have to continue losing money on the deal until 2021.
So the City Council simply voted to terminate the deal. And if Goldman Sachs wont let Oakland out, the city will stop doing any business with the bank, per the resolution. This is from a press release on the action:
This will bear watching over the next couple months, because Wall Street banks have over 1,000 similar interest rate-swap deals with local governments and agencies, and if Goldman Sachs blinks, it could create space for other governments to join in on this protest movement...Goldman has 60 days to waive the penalty or lose all business with the City of Oakland.
If the Libor scandal did end up hurting local governments to a large degree, you can just add that to the list. Local governments have been easy marks for the financial industry during the last decade, engaging in all kinds of interest rate-swap deals and other vehicles for financing operations. When they turn sour, the locals, not the banks, end up holding the bag.
One city is trying to flip that script. The Oakland City Council unanimously voted to break off a deal with Goldman Sachs, using the citys leverage to try and get out of the deal that is hurting their taxpayers. The issue concerns a familiar interest rate-swap deal, which financial institutions sell to cities as a way to hedge against higher interest rates, but which have cost cities millions by locking in higher borrowing costs.
The council voted to demand Goldman Sachs to negotiate with the city to get out of a 1998 interest rate-swap deal without having to pay a $15 million penalty. Currently, because of the locked-in rates, the deal is costing the city $4 million a year. Oakland estimates they have lost $17.5 million on the deal so far, and even though the underlying bonds were sold back four years ago, because of that $15 million penalty, the city will have to continue losing money on the deal until 2021.
So the City Council simply voted to terminate the deal. And if Goldman Sachs wont let Oakland out, the city will stop doing any business with the bank, per the resolution. This is from a press release on the action:
During the unanimous vote, Oakland Councilmember Rebecca Kaplan said, This is part of a growing movement of accountability on banks who took billions from taxpayers but not paying it forward. Councilmember Jane Brunner agreed: As we helped the banks, they need to help cities with these deals.
City Finance Committee Chair Ignacio de la Fuente, who supported the move, said, Its time to take a stand. We need to use the economic power we have to send a message.
City Finance Committee Chair Ignacio de la Fuente, who supported the move, said, Its time to take a stand. We need to use the economic power we have to send a message.
This will bear watching over the next couple months, because Wall Street banks have over 1,000 similar interest rate-swap deals with local governments and agencies, and if Goldman Sachs blinks, it could create space for other governments to join in on this protest movement...Goldman has 60 days to waive the penalty or lose all business with the City of Oakland.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
On the Lack of Democratic Consent of Greeks to Austerity Programs (FROM OCTOBER)
Demeter
Jul 2012
#4
Houston, we have a problem: Iceland’s capital controls Thorvaldur Gylfason, 1 Jun 2011
Demeter
Jul 2012
#11
Occupy Wall Street’s Misconconceptions According to Obama’s Job Czar JEFFERY IMmELT (OCTOBER)
Demeter
Jul 2012
#15
OMFG what a Ghoul, a Vampire, a Profiteering Alien Parasite you are, Imelt
bread_and_roses
Jul 2012
#38
Here's a suggestion out of Spain: just a little more of this Brussels Bubble crap,
Ghost Dog
Jul 2012
#47
Fed ready to do what is needed to meet goals: Williams (WHOSE GOALS MIGHT THEY MEET?)
Demeter
Jul 2012
#53
Futures Brokerage PFG Best Freezes Accounts Following Discovery Of Accounting Irregularity
Roland99
Jul 2012
#65
Center for Popular Economics - free - Economics for the 99% Booklet/Zine
bread_and_roses
Jul 2012
#66