Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Rise Again August 10-12, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)2. The Romney / Obama Diversion: Say Goodbye to Social Security by ROB URIE
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/08/03/say-goodbye-to-social-security/
In a New York Times editorial ( http://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/12/opinion/recession-why-worry.html?src=pm ) written in 1993 the late economist John Kenneth Galbraith made a point that seems to have been lost on subsequent generationsmany in the economic elite benefit from the destitution of others. Even more to the point, activist government could put the unemployed back to work tomorrow, but at a cost to the elite. By tying economic policies long known to work to competing economic interests, Dr. Galbraith explained the current conundrum. Economies in the West arent working because a small economic elite benefits from this state of affairs.
With Barack Obama, of his own initiative, slated to begin cutting government expenditures in 2013 (should he be re-elected), a number of his liberal and progressive supporters have taken to granting that the Federal budget crisis, to which he purports to be responding, is real. In fact, the debate was preceded by forty years of policies designed to systematically de-fund government, reduce labor to a beggar class and to gut any public programs that dont specifically and directly make the rich richer. To pretend that this is other than a manufactured crisis designed to shift more public resources to the already rich is to misread history.
Apparently unbeknownst to many, the working class in America has been living with austerity economics for forty years now. Since the 1970s the proportion of what American labor is paid relative to what it produces has been declining, as have the effective tax rates on corporations and the wealthy. With corporations and the rich who own them receiving a larger proportion of what labor produces and paying less in taxes, there is now little left to pay for necessary social programs such as schools, health care and pensions. But this shortfall is no accident. It is the intended result of four decades of policies specifically designed to enrich the ruling class at the expense of labor, the middle class and the poor.
In modern history the shift of social wealth from labor to the ruling class began in earnest with Democrat Jimmy Carter in the White House in the late-1970s. A series of politically motivated oil embargoes quite predictably led the oil-dependent manufacturing economy to rising prices and lower outputstagflation. Through arcane theory still practiced by the American economic mainstream, the causethe oil embargoes with attendant rising prices and reduced output, was converted to effect, as if from over-regulation and Keynesian management of the capitalist economy. The proposed solutions derived from these (implausible) economic theories were de-regulation, the destruction of labors bargaining power and the return to (long discredited) market solutions to policy issues....
MUCH MORE AT LINK
In a New York Times editorial ( http://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/12/opinion/recession-why-worry.html?src=pm ) written in 1993 the late economist John Kenneth Galbraith made a point that seems to have been lost on subsequent generationsmany in the economic elite benefit from the destitution of others. Even more to the point, activist government could put the unemployed back to work tomorrow, but at a cost to the elite. By tying economic policies long known to work to competing economic interests, Dr. Galbraith explained the current conundrum. Economies in the West arent working because a small economic elite benefits from this state of affairs.
With Barack Obama, of his own initiative, slated to begin cutting government expenditures in 2013 (should he be re-elected), a number of his liberal and progressive supporters have taken to granting that the Federal budget crisis, to which he purports to be responding, is real. In fact, the debate was preceded by forty years of policies designed to systematically de-fund government, reduce labor to a beggar class and to gut any public programs that dont specifically and directly make the rich richer. To pretend that this is other than a manufactured crisis designed to shift more public resources to the already rich is to misread history.
Apparently unbeknownst to many, the working class in America has been living with austerity economics for forty years now. Since the 1970s the proportion of what American labor is paid relative to what it produces has been declining, as have the effective tax rates on corporations and the wealthy. With corporations and the rich who own them receiving a larger proportion of what labor produces and paying less in taxes, there is now little left to pay for necessary social programs such as schools, health care and pensions. But this shortfall is no accident. It is the intended result of four decades of policies specifically designed to enrich the ruling class at the expense of labor, the middle class and the poor.
In modern history the shift of social wealth from labor to the ruling class began in earnest with Democrat Jimmy Carter in the White House in the late-1970s. A series of politically motivated oil embargoes quite predictably led the oil-dependent manufacturing economy to rising prices and lower outputstagflation. Through arcane theory still practiced by the American economic mainstream, the causethe oil embargoes with attendant rising prices and reduced output, was converted to effect, as if from over-regulation and Keynesian management of the capitalist economy. The proposed solutions derived from these (implausible) economic theories were de-regulation, the destruction of labors bargaining power and the return to (long discredited) market solutions to policy issues....
MUCH MORE AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Drifting Away From Our Ideals By Gar Alperovitz, The Democracy Collaborative | Book Excerpt
Demeter
Aug 2012
#3
Kevlar Tires Now Required to Traverse ‘Spear-Like’ GMO Crops By Anthony Gucciardi
Demeter
Aug 2012
#17
How Back-to-the-Landers in California Inspired a Japanese Farmer to Fight Desertification
Demeter
Aug 2012
#30
Justice Dept. Ends Investigation into Goldman Sachs Mortgage Abuses Without Pressing Charges
Demeter
Aug 2012
#26
COULDN'T MAKE THIS UP: Alleged Chinese-Mexican Meth Lord Is Causing A Headache For Sheldon Adelson
Demeter
Aug 2012
#29
Can anyone remember the map I posted a few years ago of a possible future United States
DemReadingDU
Aug 2012
#49
There's a guy advocating an amicable divorce between North and South (End the Civil War)
Demeter
Aug 2012
#54
Raging Bulls: How Wall Street Got Addicted to Light-Speed Trading By Jerry Adler MUST READ
Demeter
Aug 2012
#57
When Did Sandy Weill Change His Mind About Too Big To Fail? And Why? MATT TAIBBI
Demeter
Aug 2012
#62
Countries With Less Global Exposure Are Actually Doing Better Than Those With More
xchrom
Aug 2012
#70
"... it's the STRUCTURES" "... it's the STRUCTURES" "... it's the STRUCTURES"
bread_and_roses
Aug 2012
#76