Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Anonymous Weekend Economists August 31-September 3, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)10. Apple's rot starts with its Samsung lawsuit win
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/28/apple-rot-starts-with-samsung-lawsuit-win
Just like Microsoft, Apple's evolution from smart tech company to global uber-brand contains the seeds of its own destruction...I HADN'T NOTICED MICROSOFT'S DEMISE.....
Apple came close to destroying its business in the late 1980s by pursuing a suit against Microsoft claiming that Windows infringed the look and feel of the Mac desktop metaphor. Apple focused its hopes and business future on this lawsuit, while its market share dwindled. Rather than competing, it litigated. And lost.
Last week, it litigated against Samsung over its iPhone design and won.
The first justifiable conclusion might be that big companies get their way. The second might reasonably be that Apple doesn't change much: its business model remains aggressive self-righteousness. The third is what everybody knows: patent rules and philosophy are all screwed up.
As for the first point, Apple is not just a big company, but the biggest. And it is not just the biggest American company, but the most American company. It has entered a rarefied brand status in which it is now almost synonymous with American virtue: American as Apple. Its good design sense has become a major point of American pride, if not nationalism. The brand is a national asset. Apple is AT&T in its pre-break-up from; it's GM, in its what's-good-for-General-Motors-is-good-for-the-country stage; it's United Fruit when it made US foreign policy; it's Microsoft when desktop computing was transforming the world.
This is about as close to commercial omnipotence as it gets. Its unassailability, its right to be preternaturally aggressive, is built into its share price. We believe in Apple. So let us briefly consider the chance for a Korean company defending itself against (or, perish the thought, challenging) the greatest American company of the age in the eyes of an American jury....
I BOUGHT A KOREAN REFRIGERATOR...AND LET ME TELL YOU, I'M SORRY I DID.
Just like Microsoft, Apple's evolution from smart tech company to global uber-brand contains the seeds of its own destruction...I HADN'T NOTICED MICROSOFT'S DEMISE.....
Apple came close to destroying its business in the late 1980s by pursuing a suit against Microsoft claiming that Windows infringed the look and feel of the Mac desktop metaphor. Apple focused its hopes and business future on this lawsuit, while its market share dwindled. Rather than competing, it litigated. And lost.
Last week, it litigated against Samsung over its iPhone design and won.
The first justifiable conclusion might be that big companies get their way. The second might reasonably be that Apple doesn't change much: its business model remains aggressive self-righteousness. The third is what everybody knows: patent rules and philosophy are all screwed up.
As for the first point, Apple is not just a big company, but the biggest. And it is not just the biggest American company, but the most American company. It has entered a rarefied brand status in which it is now almost synonymous with American virtue: American as Apple. Its good design sense has become a major point of American pride, if not nationalism. The brand is a national asset. Apple is AT&T in its pre-break-up from; it's GM, in its what's-good-for-General-Motors-is-good-for-the-country stage; it's United Fruit when it made US foreign policy; it's Microsoft when desktop computing was transforming the world.
This is about as close to commercial omnipotence as it gets. Its unassailability, its right to be preternaturally aggressive, is built into its share price. We believe in Apple. So let us briefly consider the chance for a Korean company defending itself against (or, perish the thought, challenging) the greatest American company of the age in the eyes of an American jury....
I BOUGHT A KOREAN REFRIGERATOR...AND LET ME TELL YOU, I'M SORRY I DID.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wall St’s War Against Cities: Why Bondholders Can’t – Shouldn’t – be Paid By Michael Hudson
Demeter
Sep 2012
#20
Facebook co-founder sells ANOTHER 450,000 shares - and he's been dumping 150,000-a-day for weeks
Demeter
Aug 2012
#13
"I soon discovered that my liberal friends would indeed begrudge [a living] wage."
bread_and_roses
Sep 2012
#40
A general strike is a great idea, but won't happen in America. Not for awhile
DemReadingDU
Sep 2012
#74
Curiously, isn't "extracting value" what Rmoney's backers will expect? If this election turns into
mother earth
Sep 2012
#82
Crazy Country: 6 Reasons America Spends More on Prisons Than On Higher Education
Demeter
Sep 2012
#86