Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 1 October 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)L. Randall Wray and Michael Hudson present at the Modern Money and Public Purpose seminars. L. Randall Wray is a Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Michael Hudson Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri (Kansas City), and President of the Institute for the Study of Long-term Economic Trends (ISLET).
This video is an hour and three-quarters long Wray begins, then Hudson takes over at 43:00 so I suggest you listen to it over your Sunday morning coffee instead of NPR. (And if youve been taking note of all the tally stick jokes in the threads lately, Im guessing this video is where that comes from
)
VIDEO AT LINK
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/09/modern-money-and-public-purpose-the-historical-evolution-of-money-and-debt.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29#eGhmxW6i7PVPBYso.99
Heres an interesting passage that I hope Ive transcribed with reasonable accuracy from Michael Hudsons talk. Of Sumer:
Time passes, there is a dark age, and until 750BC we to Greece and Rome.
[HUDSON] Thats when civilization began to go down hill. Its usually considered the start of Western civilization, but what people think is the start of Western Civilization was the falling apart of Near Eastern origins of civilization, of this economy that had been put together in a very well-organized economy, and all of a sudden instead of the public institutions, you had local chieftains occurring, and in Rome, very soon you had the aristocratic families overthrow the kings, and the functions that were in the public sector in the Near East all of a sudden were taken over by private families lets call them the Mafia, because thats basically what the Roman oligarchy was.
And there was a complete change in policy from the Near Eastern Bronze Age to classical antiquity: When a new ruler would come to the throne in Mesopotamia, the first thing they would do, on their first full year on the throne, was to proclaim a clean slate. And thats because a lot of the debts that were denominated in barley couldnt be paid.
And there was a general understanding that the debts tended to grow faster than the means to pay. [Scribes] had two basic contrasts: The doubling time of debt. You knew heres this exponential curve of debt, very rapidly. [T]hey also had curves for the growth of herds, and output, and that was an S curve, just like economics textbooks today
So the rulers, when they came in, would cancel the debts for a very good reason. One of the Roman historians was given an explanation by the Egyptians for why the Phatroahs cancelled the debts: They said, if we dont cancel the debts, then the debtors are going to fall into bondage to the creditors and then nobodys going to fight in the army and well be defeated.
What happened by the time of Rome in 133BC is that you had a Milton Friedman philosophy of free markets by the oligarchy. What they realized, in Rome, was exactly what President Nixon and Hnery Kissinger realized in Chile: You cant have a free market for creditors if you dont murder everyone who disagrees with you [laughter]. If you dont kill everyone who wants to cancel the debts, if you dont kill everyone one knows history, if you dont kill the labor leaders, you cant have a free market, oligarchy style. So there was a 100 year social war in Rome, and the result was the by the time the empire got going, one quarter of the population was in debt bondage or outright slavery.
History does rhyme, doesnt it?