Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NMDemDist2

(49,314 posts)
1. first they are two different events and
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:20 PM
Dec 2012

it's not 'reduction of public services' it's an across the board 10% cut

google 'sequestration'

http://www.presstelegram.com/news/ci_21312537/funding-crisis-looms-u-s

The real-world impact of a short sequester of several weeks would vary program by program. For example, Education Department grants to school districts are sent out in early fall and wouldn't be affected unless the sequester dragged on for months. The same for a program like Head Start, in which funding is delivered to states in the summer.

But labor-intensive programs like air traffic control, meat inspection and Transportation Security Administration screening at airports would be affected immediately. Fewer employees at national parks could mean closed campgrounds and less access for visitors, and there would be fewer workplace safety inspectors.

Cuts in other federal programs might go unnoticed for a while. For example, many people eligible for subsidized housing vouchers are already on waiting lists. Their wait would just be longer.

The impact would be more pronounced if gridlock persisted and the sequester lasted a year.

In testimony to Congress earlier this month, acting White House Budget Director Jeffrey Zients said the automatic spending cuts would mean that 700,000 fewer low-income women and children would receive food aid and 100,000 preschool kids would lose places in Head Start.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dumb question about the fiscal cliff [View all] skippercollector Dec 2012 OP
first they are two different events and NMDemDist2 Dec 2012 #1
Hmmm... Rider3 Dec 2012 #2
I'm ready to go over. mbperrin Dec 2012 #4
. Prometheus_unbound Dec 2012 #3
wrong. the Bush era tax cuts for everyone ... Blackhawk44 Dec 2012 #5
Fine Prometheus_unbound Dec 2012 #6
Reduced demand from immediate cash could be made up mbperrin Dec 2012 #11
Taking a stab at it Yo_Mama Dec 2012 #7
Sausage. hay rick Dec 2012 #8
thanks skippercollector Dec 2012 #9
Going over the fiscal cliff (FC) would be good in the long run golfguru Dec 2012 #10
I'm back! skippercollector Jan 2013 #12
Social Security payroll tax holiday did not affect the Social Security Trust Fund at all progree Jan 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»dumb question about the f...»Reply #1