Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: guns and the social economics of mandatory liability insurance and taxation [View all]Remmah2
(3,291 posts)26. Should drinkers and drug users have liability insurance before being served?
People have done some strange things under the influence and those products are specifically designed to alter and cloud the mind.
How many people have done stupid things with guns while under the influence? Was it the gun or the altered mind?
How many people have been killed by drivers while impaired?
Do illegal drug dealers carry liability insurance? How many walking dead has that industry produced? How much tax has been collected on that industry?
Of the 30,000 Americans annually killed by guns, an analysis needs to be done to look at secondary factors like criminal activity, mental health, impaired judgement, age and opportunity to be killed by alternate means that would not change the statistics.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
guns and the social economics of mandatory liability insurance and taxation [View all]
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
OP
Already addressed the liability issue re: governmental immunity on par with uninsured motorist.
westerebus
Dec 2012
#36
FBI reports "Hands, fists, feet, etc." commit 5.7% of murders, Rifles and Shotguns for 5.4%.
jody
Dec 2012
#2
1. NO. 2. where is economics in any way part of your contribution to this discussion?
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#12
I"m one of the hosts for the economy group, so YES i will take on the 'moderator' role, as you call
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#24
Not at all - it is only necessary to establish that guns are part of some crime
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#10
You say "we have established that firearms are a problem" is as ridiculous as saying "we have
jody
Dec 2012
#13
actually, let me amend that - it is not necessary to establish or prove crime at all to tax/insure
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#17
Murder is not humorous to me but proposals that are utterly ridiculous do have a sad humor to them
jody
Dec 2012
#11
and the 24th amendment outlawing any poll tax mean that there is no impediment to other taxation
Dog Gone at Penigma
Dec 2012
#32