Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 31 December 2012 (and Tuesday, 1 January 2013) [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)33. The Four Most Important Political Lessons of 2012 By Eliot Spitzer
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/four-most-important-political-lessons-2012?akid=9875.227380.D9_mUR&rd=1&src=newsletter768848&t=16
...First, we saw the end of the electoral powerat the national levelof the Republican Party's theologically rigid agenda. Mitt Romney's primary season embrace of the social and economic agenda of the more rabid elements of his party doomed him, especially the shrill immigration rhetoric and the harshly insensitive theory that no additional sacrifice or contribution should be sought from those at the top. When he tried to move away from the sharpest edges of this during the general election, the public didnt trust him.
Romney's defeat was not simply the arithmetic of voting blocs; it was the larger statement that " We all did build this." The sense of community in our politics and society re-asserted itself against the hard individualism of the right. Hence the near certainty that Congress will enact immigration reform and tax rates that require the wealthiest to pay more. The two theologians of the Republican PartyGrover Norquist on taxes and Wayne LaPierre on gunsare now struggling. This is good for our politics.
Second, the president did best and crafted his majority when he spoke to true progressive values. During much of his first term he was quite tepid in his embrace of those values. And his poll numbers were flat, the public disengaged from his efforts. But when he finally spoke up on the agenda that the public cares aboutfrom same-sex marriage to immigration reform to a fair distribution of the tax burdenthe public responded. The lesson is clear: The timorous politics of so many Democrats who feel compelled to rush to the middle, to be meek, to shy away from the agenda of change that is needed, is not only wrong substantively, it is wrong politically.
Third, revolutions are messy things. The initial euphoria of the Arab springthe most important foreign policy event of the past several yearshas now been replaced by the grind of upheaval that has no clear direction. Yet the move toward secular society does seem to have traction, the desire for freedom as we understand it seems to be real. There are countervailing forcesthe Islamists' desire to impose an intolerant theology. Yet in Egypt and elsewhere the foundation of democracy is visible, if under threat. Whether the state of Egypt ends up replicating Pakistan (we hope not) or Turkey (we hope so), it surely will not be Iran. The Middle East is still a mess, from Syria to Iran. Yet it does appear to be moving in the right direction.
Fourth, just because I can't resist coming back to this issue at least briefly, our financial system is still fraught with structural problems. From insider trading to LIBOR bid-rigging to analysts still shilling for IPOs they have an interest in, the problems continue. It is part human nature, part our failure to sanction properly when we need to, part our government's failure to have the backbone to restructure a system that is clearly unstable and flawed....
...First, we saw the end of the electoral powerat the national levelof the Republican Party's theologically rigid agenda. Mitt Romney's primary season embrace of the social and economic agenda of the more rabid elements of his party doomed him, especially the shrill immigration rhetoric and the harshly insensitive theory that no additional sacrifice or contribution should be sought from those at the top. When he tried to move away from the sharpest edges of this during the general election, the public didnt trust him.
Romney's defeat was not simply the arithmetic of voting blocs; it was the larger statement that " We all did build this." The sense of community in our politics and society re-asserted itself against the hard individualism of the right. Hence the near certainty that Congress will enact immigration reform and tax rates that require the wealthiest to pay more. The two theologians of the Republican PartyGrover Norquist on taxes and Wayne LaPierre on gunsare now struggling. This is good for our politics.
Second, the president did best and crafted his majority when he spoke to true progressive values. During much of his first term he was quite tepid in his embrace of those values. And his poll numbers were flat, the public disengaged from his efforts. But when he finally spoke up on the agenda that the public cares aboutfrom same-sex marriage to immigration reform to a fair distribution of the tax burdenthe public responded. The lesson is clear: The timorous politics of so many Democrats who feel compelled to rush to the middle, to be meek, to shy away from the agenda of change that is needed, is not only wrong substantively, it is wrong politically.
Third, revolutions are messy things. The initial euphoria of the Arab springthe most important foreign policy event of the past several yearshas now been replaced by the grind of upheaval that has no clear direction. Yet the move toward secular society does seem to have traction, the desire for freedom as we understand it seems to be real. There are countervailing forcesthe Islamists' desire to impose an intolerant theology. Yet in Egypt and elsewhere the foundation of democracy is visible, if under threat. Whether the state of Egypt ends up replicating Pakistan (we hope not) or Turkey (we hope so), it surely will not be Iran. The Middle East is still a mess, from Syria to Iran. Yet it does appear to be moving in the right direction.
Fourth, just because I can't resist coming back to this issue at least briefly, our financial system is still fraught with structural problems. From insider trading to LIBOR bid-rigging to analysts still shilling for IPOs they have an interest in, the problems continue. It is part human nature, part our failure to sanction properly when we need to, part our government's failure to have the backbone to restructure a system that is clearly unstable and flawed....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 31 December 2012 (and Tuesday, 1 January 2013) [View all]
Tansy_Gold
Dec 2012
OP
What I'm not clear on is the degree to which B.O. understands what he's doing . . .
snot
Dec 2012
#28
We have already been sold down the river. Just waiting for the signature on the paperwork. n/t
Hotler
Dec 2012
#31
Chris Hedges Explains How Entire Regions Within the US Are Treated Like Exploited Colonies
Demeter
Dec 2012
#34
Banks Deeply Involved in FBI-Coordinated Suppression of “Terrorist” Occupy Wall Street
Demeter
Dec 2012
#38
Budget Shortfalls in Maine Public Health Care Program Point to Single-Payer Solution
Demeter
Jan 2013
#49
BOMBSHELL! Florida Judge Finds US Bank in Contempt of Court! (US Bank v. Jansen)
Demeter
Jan 2013
#65
Is our republic coming to an unceremonious end? History may not be on America's side By Steven Stra
Demeter
Jan 2013
#52
A Wee Comparison of Civil Liberties in the United States of America By Kevin Drum
Demeter
Jan 2013
#53
If You Work In California Or Illinois, Your Boss Can't Ask You For Your Facebook Password Anymore
xchrom
Jan 2013
#59
But my sister born in the 50s on the 31st gave my parents another deduction that year.
kickysnana
Jan 2013
#83