Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 25 January 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)9. Free Market Champions Demand Prosecution of Fraud (CONTINUATION)
A strong rule of law is the main determinant of prosperity. On the other hand, failure to prosecute fraud is destroying our prosperity.
Nuclear meltdowns, the financial crisis and the Gulf oil spill all happened for the same reason: fraud to make a few more pennies, and a subsequent cover-up to try to protect the wrongdoers and continue "business as usual".
This is not free market economics.
Indeed, the father of free market economics - Adam Smith - leading Austrian economists, and other free market advocates are for the prosecution of fraud:
There is a widespread myth that free market supporters are against regulation or prosecuting fraud.
In fact, Adam Smith the father of free market capitalism was for regulation of banks, and believed that trust is vital for a healthy economy. Because strong enforcement of laws against fraud is a basic prerequisite for trust, Smith would be disgusted by the lack of prosecution of Wall Street fraudsters today.
Smith railed against monopolies and their corrupting influence. And Smith was pro-regulation, so long as the regulation benefited the little guy, as opposed to the wealthiest:
Richard Posner one of the leading proponents over the course of many decades for removing the reach of the law from the economy has now changed his mind. So has another leading proponent of deregulation and turning a blind eye towards fraud: Alan Greenspan. While some promoters of a fake version of Austrian economics are anti-regulation and against prosecuting fraud, the main Austrian economists were unambiguously for them.
William K. Black professor of economics and law, and the senior regulator during the S&L crisis notes that leading Austrian free market economists said that fraud must be prosecuted:
Black also notes that fraud is a leading cause of financial bubbles and malinvestment two of the greatest sins which Austrian economists rightly fight against.
Unless financial fraud is prosecuted, bubbles will be blown and when they burst, the economy will tank. Fraud along with bad Federal Reserve policy is what causes bubbles in the first place.
In fact, Adam Smith the father of free market capitalism was for regulation of banks, and believed that trust is vital for a healthy economy. Because strong enforcement of laws against fraud is a basic prerequisite for trust, Smith would be disgusted by the lack of prosecution of Wall Street fraudsters today.
Smith railed against monopolies and their corrupting influence. And Smith was pro-regulation, so long as the regulation benefited the little guy, as opposed to the wealthiest:
When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters.
Richard Posner one of the leading proponents over the course of many decades for removing the reach of the law from the economy has now changed his mind. So has another leading proponent of deregulation and turning a blind eye towards fraud: Alan Greenspan. While some promoters of a fake version of Austrian economics are anti-regulation and against prosecuting fraud, the main Austrian economists were unambiguously for them.
William K. Black professor of economics and law, and the senior regulator during the S&L crisis notes that leading Austrian free market economists said that fraud must be prosecuted:
Real Austrian economists
hate elite frauds and want them prosecuted vigorously. Ludwig von Mises and Friederich Hayek are the two most famous Austrian economists.
Hayek, F.A. The Road to Serfdom
To create conditions in which competition will be as effective as possible, to prevent fraud and deception, to break up monopolies these tasks provide a wide and unquestioned field for state activity.
The Constitution of Liberty
There remains, however, one other kind of harmful action that is generally thought desirable to prevent and which at first might seem distinct. This is fraud and deception. Yet, though it would be straining the meaning of words to call them coercion, on examination it appears that the reasons why we want to prevent them are the same as those applying to coercion. Deception, like coercion, is a form of manipulating the data on which a person counts, in order to make him do what deceiver wants him to do. Where it is successful, the deceived becomes in the same manner the unwilling tool, serving another mans ends without advancing his own. Though we have no single word to cover both, all we have said of coercion applies equally to fraud and deception.
With this correction, it seems that freedom demands no more than that coercion and violence, fraud and deception, be prevented, except for the use of coercion by government for the sole purpose of enforcing known rules intended to ensure the best conditions under which the individual may give his activities a coherent, rational pattern ..
Liberty not only means that the individual has both the opportunity and the burden of choice; it also means that he must bear the consequences of his actions . Liberty and responsibility are inseparable.
Mises, L.
Government ought to protect the individuals within the country against the violent and fraudulent attacks of gangsters, and it should defend the country against foreign enemies.
Hayek, F.A. The Road to Serfdom
To create conditions in which competition will be as effective as possible, to prevent fraud and deception, to break up monopolies these tasks provide a wide and unquestioned field for state activity.
The Constitution of Liberty
There remains, however, one other kind of harmful action that is generally thought desirable to prevent and which at first might seem distinct. This is fraud and deception. Yet, though it would be straining the meaning of words to call them coercion, on examination it appears that the reasons why we want to prevent them are the same as those applying to coercion. Deception, like coercion, is a form of manipulating the data on which a person counts, in order to make him do what deceiver wants him to do. Where it is successful, the deceived becomes in the same manner the unwilling tool, serving another mans ends without advancing his own. Though we have no single word to cover both, all we have said of coercion applies equally to fraud and deception.
With this correction, it seems that freedom demands no more than that coercion and violence, fraud and deception, be prevented, except for the use of coercion by government for the sole purpose of enforcing known rules intended to ensure the best conditions under which the individual may give his activities a coherent, rational pattern ..
Liberty not only means that the individual has both the opportunity and the burden of choice; it also means that he must bear the consequences of his actions . Liberty and responsibility are inseparable.
Mises, L.
Government ought to protect the individuals within the country against the violent and fraudulent attacks of gangsters, and it should defend the country against foreign enemies.
Black also notes that fraud is a leading cause of financial bubbles and malinvestment two of the greatest sins which Austrian economists rightly fight against.
Unless financial fraud is prosecuted, bubbles will be blown and when they burst, the economy will tank. Fraud along with bad Federal Reserve policy is what causes bubbles in the first place.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Proof Is In the Pudding: Fewer Prosecutions Equals a Worse Economy (CONCLUSION)
Demeter
Jan 2013
#10
I'd like to see thorium reactors. Thorium is more plentiful and way safer than uranium.
tclambert
Jan 2013
#11
Hamptons Prices Soar To Record As Lloyd Blankfein Parks $33 Million In 8,000 Square Foot Mansion
Demeter
Jan 2013
#19
Morgan Stanley Bankers Sold Off 'Shitbag' CDOs With 'Nuclear' Capabilities To Clients
Demeter
Jan 2013
#25
Extraordinary Images Of The Hottest Country In The World For Untapped Natural Resources
xchrom
Jan 2013
#34
Taibbi: Choice of Mary Jo White to Head SEC Puts Fox In Charge of Hen House
DemReadingDU
Jan 2013
#53