Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 21 February 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)15. What Could Go Wrong? White House to Partner With Big Business to Combat 'Online Radicalization'
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/what-could-go-wrong-white-house-partner-big-business-combat-online-radicalization?akid=10077.227380.C5OLt_&rd=1&src=newsletter797084&t=14
... As FireDogLakes DSWright points out, the White House is looking for ways to counter online speech that is radical and tied to terrorism.
A White House statement released earlier this month states that the Federal Government is committed to empowering members of the public to protect themselves against the full range of online threats, including online radicalization to violence. As DSWright notes, what the government is saying is that the internet is gaining in power and we have not figured out a way to dominate it yet. And thats scaring the government.
The groups involved in online radicalization to violence include, of course, Al-Qaeda and white supremacist groups. But its not a stretch of the imagination to realize that trying to regulate the speech of extremists can bleed into regulating the speech of plain old law-abiding dissidents.
Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the White House plan to counter online radicalization is its plan to work with industry to do so. The Federal Government will collaborate with industry to explore how we might counter online violent extremism while protecting lawful Internet use and the civil liberties and privacy of individual users, according to the White House. Many companies have developed voluntary measures to promote Internet safety (such as fraud warnings, identity protection, and Internet safety tips), and we look forward to hearing their views about how we might apply similar measures to counter online radicalization to violence.
As DSWright writes, this is nothing to welcome. Big Government and Big Business working together, all to help us. This marriage of state and corporate power to regulate the internet sounds great doesnt it?...Allowing the government to work with industry to develop countermeasures to radical speech is a great way to protect all our freedom. What could go wrong?
... As FireDogLakes DSWright points out, the White House is looking for ways to counter online speech that is radical and tied to terrorism.
A White House statement released earlier this month states that the Federal Government is committed to empowering members of the public to protect themselves against the full range of online threats, including online radicalization to violence. As DSWright notes, what the government is saying is that the internet is gaining in power and we have not figured out a way to dominate it yet. And thats scaring the government.
The groups involved in online radicalization to violence include, of course, Al-Qaeda and white supremacist groups. But its not a stretch of the imagination to realize that trying to regulate the speech of extremists can bleed into regulating the speech of plain old law-abiding dissidents.
Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the White House plan to counter online radicalization is its plan to work with industry to do so. The Federal Government will collaborate with industry to explore how we might counter online violent extremism while protecting lawful Internet use and the civil liberties and privacy of individual users, according to the White House. Many companies have developed voluntary measures to promote Internet safety (such as fraud warnings, identity protection, and Internet safety tips), and we look forward to hearing their views about how we might apply similar measures to counter online radicalization to violence.
As DSWright writes, this is nothing to welcome. Big Government and Big Business working together, all to help us. This marriage of state and corporate power to regulate the internet sounds great doesnt it?...Allowing the government to work with industry to develop countermeasures to radical speech is a great way to protect all our freedom. What could go wrong?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Finance and the American poor: Margin calls; Life on the edges of America’s financial mainstream
Demeter
Feb 2013
#1
What Could Go Wrong? White House to Partner With Big Business to Combat 'Online Radicalization'
Demeter
Feb 2013
#15
FOR EXAMPLE: 40 Cities Around Globe Set to Protest 1,000th Day of Bradley Manning's Imprisonment
Demeter
Feb 2013
#16
Business may not care about Bradley Manning, but they do care about ordinary citizens
amandabeech
Feb 2013
#36
ETA News Release: Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (02/21/2013)
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2013
#21