Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Salute Our Favorite Bunnies March 29-31, 2013 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)27. Profit Share Hits Post-War High and the Post Doesn't Notice by Dean Baker
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/03/30-0

The revised GDP data for the fourth quarter released yesterday showed the profit share of corporate income hitting 25.6 percent. This is the highest since it stood at 25.8 percent in 1951. However if we look at the after-tax share of 19.2 percent, we would have to go back to 20.8 percent share in 1930 to find a higher number, excepting of course the 19.3 percent number hit last year.
To put this in context, the after-tax profit share was just 14.5 percent in Reagan's Morning in America days. The difference would have come to roughly $330 billion last year. To put this in the 10-year budgetary window that is the standard framework in Washington these days, the rise in after-tax corporate profits since the Reagan era can be seen as equivalent to a $5.0 trillion tax on the nation's workers.
This surge in profits in a weak economy (profits tend to move with the cycle) is striking but readers of the Washington Post version of AP piece on the data wouldn't know anything about it. This piece includes no mention of the jump in corporate profits in 2012.
There are a few other issues that the piece could have better presented to readers. It noted that:
"The fourth quarter was hurt by the sharpest fall in defense spending in 40 years."

The revised GDP data for the fourth quarter released yesterday showed the profit share of corporate income hitting 25.6 percent. This is the highest since it stood at 25.8 percent in 1951. However if we look at the after-tax share of 19.2 percent, we would have to go back to 20.8 percent share in 1930 to find a higher number, excepting of course the 19.3 percent number hit last year.
To put this in context, the after-tax profit share was just 14.5 percent in Reagan's Morning in America days. The difference would have come to roughly $330 billion last year. To put this in the 10-year budgetary window that is the standard framework in Washington these days, the rise in after-tax corporate profits since the Reagan era can be seen as equivalent to a $5.0 trillion tax on the nation's workers.
This surge in profits in a weak economy (profits tend to move with the cycle) is striking but readers of the Washington Post version of AP piece on the data wouldn't know anything about it. This piece includes no mention of the jump in corporate profits in 2012.
There are a few other issues that the piece could have better presented to readers. It noted that:
"The fourth quarter was hurt by the sharpest fall in defense spending in 40 years."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Five Ugly Extremes of Inequality in America -- The Contrasts Will Drop Your Chin to the Floor By Pa
Demeter
Mar 2013
#15
Book review: ‘The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America’ by David Stockman
xchrom
Mar 2013
#20
Pentagon civilians face reduced unpaid leave due to funding bill, Hagel says SEQUESTERGATE
Demeter
Mar 2013
#33
This German Professor Is Rising In Power With His Call To Get Rid Of The Euro In Order To Save Europ
xchrom
Mar 2013
#43
Why Sherrod Brown Is Wall Street's Biggest Nightmare In Washington DC MORE THAN ELIZABETH?
Demeter
Mar 2013
#51
"Capitalism Never Solves Its Crisis Problems; It Moves Them Around Geographically" By Gaius Publius
Demeter
Mar 2013
#53
back in the dark ages -- i was fascinated with playboy bunnies and pan am stewardesses --
xchrom
Mar 2013
#68
Anyone on this thread who claims to be concerned about the power of big banks and also supports FTAs
OrwellwasRight
Mar 2013
#73
"Free trade," by taking away net jobs, not only robs the individual and the family
amandabeech
Mar 2013
#82
I need a new life. I am calling it a wrap, but you can keep going until Tansy posts
Demeter
Mar 2013
#81