Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 11 April 2013 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)11. The Madness of NYT’s Tom Friedman
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/04/11-3
When ranking which multi-millionaire American pundit is the most overrated, there are, without doubt, many worthy contenders, but one near the top of any list must be the New York Times Thomas L. Friedman with his long record of disastrous policy pronouncements including his enthusiasm for George W. Bushs invasion of Iraq.
Friedman, of course, has paid no career price for his misguided judgments and simplistic nostrums. Like many other star pundits who inhabit the Op-Ed pages of the Times and the Washington Post, Friedman has ascended to a place where the normal powers of gravity dont apply, where the cumulative weight of his errors only lifts him up.
Indeed, there is something profoundly nonsensical about Friedmans Olympian standing, inhabiting a plane of existence governed by the crazy rules of Washingtons conventional wisdom, where when looking down on the rest of us Friedman feels free to cast aspersions on other peoples sanity, like the Mad Hatter calling the Church Mouse nuts.
Friedman describes every foreign adversary who reacts against U.S. dictates as suffering from various stages of insanity. He accepts no possibility that these designated enemies are acting out of their own sense of self-interest and even fear of what the United States might be designing.
When ranking which multi-millionaire American pundit is the most overrated, there are, without doubt, many worthy contenders, but one near the top of any list must be the New York Times Thomas L. Friedman with his long record of disastrous policy pronouncements including his enthusiasm for George W. Bushs invasion of Iraq.
Friedman, of course, has paid no career price for his misguided judgments and simplistic nostrums. Like many other star pundits who inhabit the Op-Ed pages of the Times and the Washington Post, Friedman has ascended to a place where the normal powers of gravity dont apply, where the cumulative weight of his errors only lifts him up.
Indeed, there is something profoundly nonsensical about Friedmans Olympian standing, inhabiting a plane of existence governed by the crazy rules of Washingtons conventional wisdom, where when looking down on the rest of us Friedman feels free to cast aspersions on other peoples sanity, like the Mad Hatter calling the Church Mouse nuts.
Friedman describes every foreign adversary who reacts against U.S. dictates as suffering from various stages of insanity. He accepts no possibility that these designated enemies are acting out of their own sense of self-interest and even fear of what the United States might be designing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tansy, Chain of Fools? and no Aretha? blasphemy (K & R anyway, musical interlude provided below)
mother earth
Apr 2013
#33