Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Go Through the Looking Glass May 17-19, 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)60. How a Well-Meaning Progressive Accidentally Launched Powerball Lottery Industry Across America
http://www.alternet.org/economy/how-well-meaning-progressive-accidentally-launched-powerball-lottery-industry-across-america?akid=10456.227380.8htJKj&rd=1&src=newsletter842428&t=7&paging=off
Beyond the feel-good story of the New Jersey bodega operator who struck it rich with a lucky ticket, the recent Powerball jackpot of $338 million was actually rather unremarkable. Indeed, both the Powerball and the Mega Millions lotteries have previously seen their jackpots push past the half billion mark. The trend of sky-high jackpots can be traced back 25 years, when Americas state lottery directors banded together to fend off a new federal proposal from Rep. Cardiss Collins. The Illinois Congresswoman, who died on February 3, is fondly remembered for her time as the lone African-American woman in the House of Representatives and for her unwavering advocacy on behalf of the poor. Yet the Chicago-based icon is less known for her proposal to start a national lottery, which ultimatelyand unintentionallyhelped lead to our current frenzied practices of jackpot gambling.
In 1985, Collins proposed a national lottery to supplement Social Security and Medicare via federal savings bonds. Instead of a ticket, the bettor would purchase a bond whose serial number would serve as the ticket number. Thus, the millions of lottery losers would have been left holding a savings bond rather than a worthless ticket or a crumpled scratch game card. Collins proposal was blocked in the House, but not before it set off a wave of fear and panic among state lottery directors and their corporate contractors, who were quick to take action. The worry in lottery circles was that a national lottery, with its massive pool of potential bettors, would be able to build far larger jackpots than those offered by the existing state gambling operations. According to the magazine Gaming and Wagering Business, in an effort to beat the federal government to the punch, a consortium of several state lotteries hatched a plan to run a giant multi-state lotto game that would rival Congress fledgling plans. The result was the game Lotto America, which went on sale in February 1988, initially offered in six states and the District of Columbia.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the history of lottery gambling in the United States is the apprehension evinced by 80s lottery executives as they experimented with new ways to drive up jackpot amounts. I dont know if wed feel comfortable with $40 million jackpots, Pennsylvanias lottery director said in 1986. Delawares lottery director echoed that sentiment, explaining that the public might think jackpots of $50 to $100 million were obscene for one person to win. Californias lottery director summed up the problem: I hate to use the term moralitybut there is an issue involved in excessively large jackpots. With such concerns in mind, Lotto America initially planned to cap its jackpots at $80 million in order to prevent grotesque sums from accumulating. Yet the evidence was already clear that jackpot size (rather than offering good odds) was the most effective way to attract new bettors, and thus jackpots were left uncapped. Over the next several years, Lotto America added several more states and reduced the odds of winning to ensure that jackpots rolled over week after week, climbing higher and higher. In 1992, the game was renamed Powerball. Four years later Powerball was joined by another multi-state lottery called the Big Game, later renamed Mega Millions. The games eventually agreed to overlap, and now 44 of the 46 lottery jurisdictions in the nation feature multi-state jackpot games. Thus we now have not one, but two de facto national lotteries. The only thing we are lacking is any meaningful national regulatory framework for lottery practices, which are becoming more predatory as they explore new marketing practices and increasingly addictive games such as Quick Draw and video lottery terminals.
A significant cultural shift has taken place in the years since Collins offered a socially responsible framework for government lotteries, and cultural reservations about the concentration of wealth have long since been put aside. In 2012 the Mega Millions jackpot broke $500 million, leaving behind quaint notions that people might take offense at such accumulation. The rise of such gambling forms has co-evolved with the development of an intensely skewed distribution of wealth in this country over the past 30 years. As countless Americans lay down their bets week after week, they are registering their consent for a pattern of wealth distribution that, not long ago, was considered obscene or grotesque. These acts of betting are small, and most people experience them as inconsequential. But like the jackpots themselves, these small acts accumulate into something significant. The massive civic participation in government lotteries helps provide the cultural foundation for our jackpot way of life.
Beyond the feel-good story of the New Jersey bodega operator who struck it rich with a lucky ticket, the recent Powerball jackpot of $338 million was actually rather unremarkable. Indeed, both the Powerball and the Mega Millions lotteries have previously seen their jackpots push past the half billion mark. The trend of sky-high jackpots can be traced back 25 years, when Americas state lottery directors banded together to fend off a new federal proposal from Rep. Cardiss Collins. The Illinois Congresswoman, who died on February 3, is fondly remembered for her time as the lone African-American woman in the House of Representatives and for her unwavering advocacy on behalf of the poor. Yet the Chicago-based icon is less known for her proposal to start a national lottery, which ultimatelyand unintentionallyhelped lead to our current frenzied practices of jackpot gambling.
In 1985, Collins proposed a national lottery to supplement Social Security and Medicare via federal savings bonds. Instead of a ticket, the bettor would purchase a bond whose serial number would serve as the ticket number. Thus, the millions of lottery losers would have been left holding a savings bond rather than a worthless ticket or a crumpled scratch game card. Collins proposal was blocked in the House, but not before it set off a wave of fear and panic among state lottery directors and their corporate contractors, who were quick to take action. The worry in lottery circles was that a national lottery, with its massive pool of potential bettors, would be able to build far larger jackpots than those offered by the existing state gambling operations. According to the magazine Gaming and Wagering Business, in an effort to beat the federal government to the punch, a consortium of several state lotteries hatched a plan to run a giant multi-state lotto game that would rival Congress fledgling plans. The result was the game Lotto America, which went on sale in February 1988, initially offered in six states and the District of Columbia.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the history of lottery gambling in the United States is the apprehension evinced by 80s lottery executives as they experimented with new ways to drive up jackpot amounts. I dont know if wed feel comfortable with $40 million jackpots, Pennsylvanias lottery director said in 1986. Delawares lottery director echoed that sentiment, explaining that the public might think jackpots of $50 to $100 million were obscene for one person to win. Californias lottery director summed up the problem: I hate to use the term moralitybut there is an issue involved in excessively large jackpots. With such concerns in mind, Lotto America initially planned to cap its jackpots at $80 million in order to prevent grotesque sums from accumulating. Yet the evidence was already clear that jackpot size (rather than offering good odds) was the most effective way to attract new bettors, and thus jackpots were left uncapped. Over the next several years, Lotto America added several more states and reduced the odds of winning to ensure that jackpots rolled over week after week, climbing higher and higher. In 1992, the game was renamed Powerball. Four years later Powerball was joined by another multi-state lottery called the Big Game, later renamed Mega Millions. The games eventually agreed to overlap, and now 44 of the 46 lottery jurisdictions in the nation feature multi-state jackpot games. Thus we now have not one, but two de facto national lotteries. The only thing we are lacking is any meaningful national regulatory framework for lottery practices, which are becoming more predatory as they explore new marketing practices and increasingly addictive games such as Quick Draw and video lottery terminals.
A significant cultural shift has taken place in the years since Collins offered a socially responsible framework for government lotteries, and cultural reservations about the concentration of wealth have long since been put aside. In 2012 the Mega Millions jackpot broke $500 million, leaving behind quaint notions that people might take offense at such accumulation. The rise of such gambling forms has co-evolved with the development of an intensely skewed distribution of wealth in this country over the past 30 years. As countless Americans lay down their bets week after week, they are registering their consent for a pattern of wealth distribution that, not long ago, was considered obscene or grotesque. These acts of betting are small, and most people experience them as inconsequential. But like the jackpots themselves, these small acts accumulate into something significant. The massive civic participation in government lotteries helps provide the cultural foundation for our jackpot way of life.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Growing Cost of Having Kids Is Tipping More Women Towards Ambivalence about Motherhood
Demeter
May 2013
#7
Rich Don't Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class
Demeter
May 2013
#11
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action By Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers
Demeter
May 2013
#12
Dow 15,000 is only the beginning; Commentary: Why investors distrust the rally By Jeff Reeves
Demeter
May 2013
#14
KBR Tells U.S. Army it will Cost $500 Million and Take 13 Years to Close out Its Iraq Contract
Demeter
May 2013
#27
Elizabeth Warren's 1st Bill: Student Loans at Same Low Rate as Big Banks, 0.75%
Demeter
May 2013
#30
New App Helps Avoid Koch Industries & Monsanto, Trace Corporate Ownership of Everything in Shopping
Demeter
May 2013
#39
Popular Resistance Percolating Across Country -- Inspiring Activism Corporate Media Always Ignores
Demeter
May 2013
#41
Military Quietly Grants Itself the Power to Police the Streets Without Local or State Consent
Demeter
May 2013
#42
Who Can Stop the Koch Brothers From Buying the Tribune Papers? Unions Can, & Should By Matt Taibbi
Demeter
May 2013
#49
You're right, as usual, but I don't hear anyone that matters talking about anything
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#64