Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 16 January 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)11. PREQUEL: How Ed DeMarco finally cried fraud By Maureen Tkacik
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/10/25/how-ed-demarco-finally-cried-fraud/
It took three years, but Fannie/Freddie Conservator Ed DeMarco is starting to channel his inner Irving Picard by acknowledging that among root causes of the financial crisis is fraud, and lots of it...Trying to parse the madness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the past few years has given me a new appreciation for Bernie Madoff. Bernie might not have left much for his victims, but at least they finally got a straight answer about what hed been doing with their money all those years, and a sensible legal framework for recovering and winding down all that might be left....Like Madoffs estate, Fannie and Freddie have spent the last three years under a kind of bankruptcy protection, led by a conservator, DeMarco, whose top priority is to maximize the value of the national estate and thereby minimize harm to the housing bubbles innumerable victims. As both trustees travails demonstrate, its a thankless job: Madoffs former investors smear Irving Picard in the press so regularly its as if they forgot about Madoff, and Fannie/Freddie conservator Edward DeMarco has alienated so many politicians with his long list of offenses that Timothy Geithner, who recommended him for the job in the first place, is now said to be plotting to oust him.
But where Picard has annoyed by taking a direct approach to the job, DeMarcos actions have been mystifying. Picard has: canceled the car leases, gym memberships, etc.; listed Madoffs houses/boats/jewelry for sale or waited until the market recovers; and (this is the controversial part, but its also brought in the big bucks) filed clawback suits against anyone who booked fictitious profits off their Madoff investment in order of biggest to smallish; reimburse, rinse, repeat.
By contrast, Fannie and Freddie have focused their clawback actions almost exclusively on the hardest hit victims of the housing crisis: struggling homeowners whose outstanding mortgage balances are worth more than their houses, and we taxpayers, who get hit up for a new cash infusion just about every month, for a total that should soon top $200 billion. DeMarco, whose enterprises own or guarantee half the outstanding mortgages in America, has not only flatly refused time and again to modify underwater mortgages, hes actually promised to sue any delinquent borrower his agency suspects of taking Suze Ormans advice and defaulting strategically. (Yesterdays announcement by President Obama that some FHFA regulations were being scrapped to help homeowners refinance is the first let-up on underwater borrowers by DeMarco, and by all appearances, it was policy driven from the White House, not his office.)
Also: a whistleblower lawsuit filed last year accuses Fannie of deliberately sabotaging struggling homeowners who sought mortgage modifications ostensibly offered in the Administrations 2009 mortgage relief program HAMP by pushing them into temporary modificationsfor which Fannie executives drew fat rentention bonuseswith no follow-up or due diligence, then dropping the ball. More recently a harrowing three-part investigation in the Detroit Free-Press chronicled the GSEs pattern of intervening in other banks mortgage modification negotiations, in which Fannie seems to be systematically using its authority as a mortgage guarantor to force (and accelerate) foreclosures even when banks would rather work out a deal....Tapped-out homeowners arent the only ones the mortgage monsters are fighting bitterly in Americas courtrooms: in September Freddie Mac sued the IRS to keep $3 billion in back taxes they allegedly owed from the Bush Administration years during which they had understated their earnings. (In this case they had inspiration: ward of the state AIG filed a similar complaint in 2009.) Meanwhile on the big fish end of operations, DeMarco has left billions of dollars at the negotiating table with other TBTF counterparts, according to an inspector general report just released. The report suggested that a $1.35 billion settlement Freddie Mac had struck to indemnify Bank of America over a bad batch of Countrywide loans might have been ten times that size if Freddie management had honestly estimated its losses in the deal....
It took three years, but Fannie/Freddie Conservator Ed DeMarco is starting to channel his inner Irving Picard by acknowledging that among root causes of the financial crisis is fraud, and lots of it...Trying to parse the madness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the past few years has given me a new appreciation for Bernie Madoff. Bernie might not have left much for his victims, but at least they finally got a straight answer about what hed been doing with their money all those years, and a sensible legal framework for recovering and winding down all that might be left....Like Madoffs estate, Fannie and Freddie have spent the last three years under a kind of bankruptcy protection, led by a conservator, DeMarco, whose top priority is to maximize the value of the national estate and thereby minimize harm to the housing bubbles innumerable victims. As both trustees travails demonstrate, its a thankless job: Madoffs former investors smear Irving Picard in the press so regularly its as if they forgot about Madoff, and Fannie/Freddie conservator Edward DeMarco has alienated so many politicians with his long list of offenses that Timothy Geithner, who recommended him for the job in the first place, is now said to be plotting to oust him.
But where Picard has annoyed by taking a direct approach to the job, DeMarcos actions have been mystifying. Picard has: canceled the car leases, gym memberships, etc.; listed Madoffs houses/boats/jewelry for sale or waited until the market recovers; and (this is the controversial part, but its also brought in the big bucks) filed clawback suits against anyone who booked fictitious profits off their Madoff investment in order of biggest to smallish; reimburse, rinse, repeat.
By contrast, Fannie and Freddie have focused their clawback actions almost exclusively on the hardest hit victims of the housing crisis: struggling homeowners whose outstanding mortgage balances are worth more than their houses, and we taxpayers, who get hit up for a new cash infusion just about every month, for a total that should soon top $200 billion. DeMarco, whose enterprises own or guarantee half the outstanding mortgages in America, has not only flatly refused time and again to modify underwater mortgages, hes actually promised to sue any delinquent borrower his agency suspects of taking Suze Ormans advice and defaulting strategically. (Yesterdays announcement by President Obama that some FHFA regulations were being scrapped to help homeowners refinance is the first let-up on underwater borrowers by DeMarco, and by all appearances, it was policy driven from the White House, not his office.)
Also: a whistleblower lawsuit filed last year accuses Fannie of deliberately sabotaging struggling homeowners who sought mortgage modifications ostensibly offered in the Administrations 2009 mortgage relief program HAMP by pushing them into temporary modificationsfor which Fannie executives drew fat rentention bonuseswith no follow-up or due diligence, then dropping the ball. More recently a harrowing three-part investigation in the Detroit Free-Press chronicled the GSEs pattern of intervening in other banks mortgage modification negotiations, in which Fannie seems to be systematically using its authority as a mortgage guarantor to force (and accelerate) foreclosures even when banks would rather work out a deal....Tapped-out homeowners arent the only ones the mortgage monsters are fighting bitterly in Americas courtrooms: in September Freddie Mac sued the IRS to keep $3 billion in back taxes they allegedly owed from the Bush Administration years during which they had understated their earnings. (In this case they had inspiration: ward of the state AIG filed a similar complaint in 2009.) Meanwhile on the big fish end of operations, DeMarco has left billions of dollars at the negotiating table with other TBTF counterparts, according to an inspector general report just released. The report suggested that a $1.35 billion settlement Freddie Mac had struck to indemnify Bank of America over a bad batch of Countrywide loans might have been ten times that size if Freddie management had honestly estimated its losses in the deal....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Occupy Wall Street: The Primary the President Never Had? AlterNet / By Matt Stoller
Demeter
Jan 2012
#9
Downgrading Europe: Why Analysts Say the S&P Debt Decision Could Have Been Much Worse
Demeter
Jan 2012
#19