Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 31 May 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)14. UBS to Pay $780 Million to Settle Tax Case
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/ubs-reaches-deal-over-offshore-banking-services/
Tearing a hole in the veil secrecy surrounding Swiss banking, UBS will pay $780 million to settle federal claims that it had helped wealthy Americans evade taxes, and it agreed to disclose the names of 19,000 clients, The New York Timess Lynnley Browning reports. Under the agreement, the bank will not have to pay additional fines and penalties that could have brought its deal to more than $1 billion. People briefed on the issue said the banking crisis and the recession were factors in prosecutors decision not to levy the additional fines and penalties. The action, unprecedented for a financial institution, is a blow for UBS the worlds largest private bank and to Swiss banking secrecy with laws that date from the 1930s but with traditions stemming from the Middle Ages.
Under the agreement, UBS admitted to conspiracy to defraud the Internal Revenue Service.
But in a shift from deferred prosecution agreements with other corporations in the past, the Justice Department will not require an outside corporate monitor on UBS. Instead, the bank must submit regular reports to United States authorities on its offshore undeclared banking business for Americans the practice that has been under investigation. UBS has said that it was formally closing the accounts associated with that business, but it will have to provide periodic written evidence of that to prosecutors for each account closed.
While the text of the deferred prosecution agreement did not cite the number of American accounts that UBS must now disclose, federal prosecutors have been looking at up to 19,000 such accounts. UBS had resisted turning over the names, even after some executives were indicted and implicated, in the offshore private banking business. The move by UBS to settle the case, on the eve of a Senate subcommittee hearing next Tuesday, signals how close the bank came to being indicted for not cooperating with prosecutors. Last month, prosecutors gave UBS several weeks to hand over scores of United States client names or face possible indictment. Prosecutors suspect that from late 2002 through 2007, UBS helped these clients hide $20 billion in violation of United States tax laws, thereby evading $300 million a year in taxes.
Tearing a hole in the veil secrecy surrounding Swiss banking, UBS will pay $780 million to settle federal claims that it had helped wealthy Americans evade taxes, and it agreed to disclose the names of 19,000 clients, The New York Timess Lynnley Browning reports. Under the agreement, the bank will not have to pay additional fines and penalties that could have brought its deal to more than $1 billion. People briefed on the issue said the banking crisis and the recession were factors in prosecutors decision not to levy the additional fines and penalties. The action, unprecedented for a financial institution, is a blow for UBS the worlds largest private bank and to Swiss banking secrecy with laws that date from the 1930s but with traditions stemming from the Middle Ages.
Under the agreement, UBS admitted to conspiracy to defraud the Internal Revenue Service.
But in a shift from deferred prosecution agreements with other corporations in the past, the Justice Department will not require an outside corporate monitor on UBS. Instead, the bank must submit regular reports to United States authorities on its offshore undeclared banking business for Americans the practice that has been under investigation. UBS has said that it was formally closing the accounts associated with that business, but it will have to provide periodic written evidence of that to prosecutors for each account closed.
While the text of the deferred prosecution agreement did not cite the number of American accounts that UBS must now disclose, federal prosecutors have been looking at up to 19,000 such accounts. UBS had resisted turning over the names, even after some executives were indicted and implicated, in the offshore private banking business. The move by UBS to settle the case, on the eve of a Senate subcommittee hearing next Tuesday, signals how close the bank came to being indicted for not cooperating with prosecutors. Last month, prosecutors gave UBS several weeks to hand over scores of United States client names or face possible indictment. Prosecutors suspect that from late 2002 through 2007, UBS helped these clients hide $20 billion in violation of United States tax laws, thereby evading $300 million a year in taxes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
America's Corrupt Justice System: Federal Private Prison Populations Grew by 784% in 10 Year Span
Demeter
May 2013
#7
Why Does the NYT Refrain from Explaining the Predatory Motives of a Billionaire-Backed Think Tank?
Demeter
May 2013
#8