Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Host a Lion July 5-7, 2013 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)48. IMF's Lagarde Says US Budget Cuts Were 'Absolutely Inappropriate'
http://www.businessinsider.com/imfs-lagarde-says-us-budget-cuts-were-absolutely-inappropriate-2013-7
AIX-EN-PROVENCE, France (Reuters) - The U.S. federal budget cuts are an inappropriate measure that will weigh on potential growth, IMF chief Christine Lagarde said on Sunday, urging Washington to present "credible" fiscal plans.
Washington enacted across-the-board federal government spending cuts, known as sequestration, in March because Congress could not agree on an alternative.
It has meant everything from furloughs for air traffic controllers to fewer planes for the U.S. Navy to smaller subsidies for farmers.
"The budgetary procedure that is in place in the United States, which leads to a budgetary adjustment, seems to us absolutely inappropriate ... because it blindly affects certain expenditures that are essential to support medium and long term growth," Lagarde told an economists' conference in Aix-en-Provence, southern France.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/imfs-lagarde-says-us-budget-cuts-were-absolutely-inappropriate-2013-7#ixzz2YMaf1ui4
AIX-EN-PROVENCE, France (Reuters) - The U.S. federal budget cuts are an inappropriate measure that will weigh on potential growth, IMF chief Christine Lagarde said on Sunday, urging Washington to present "credible" fiscal plans.
Washington enacted across-the-board federal government spending cuts, known as sequestration, in March because Congress could not agree on an alternative.
It has meant everything from furloughs for air traffic controllers to fewer planes for the U.S. Navy to smaller subsidies for farmers.
"The budgetary procedure that is in place in the United States, which leads to a budgetary adjustment, seems to us absolutely inappropriate ... because it blindly affects certain expenditures that are essential to support medium and long term growth," Lagarde told an economists' conference in Aix-en-Provence, southern France.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/imfs-lagarde-says-us-budget-cuts-were-absolutely-inappropriate-2013-7#ixzz2YMaf1ui4
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So far the only compelling argument I've heard that in fact comprehensive public surveillance is true
Hugin
Jul 2013
#20
Taxpayer money where someone somewhere is making a 20% guaranteed profit for doing nothing.
Hugin
Jul 2013
#47
What Did These Idiots Think Would Happen If We Hired Contractors To Handle Spying?
Demeter
Jul 2013
#27
Other than people who read forums, who pays attention to what is going on anyway?
DemReadingDU
Jul 2013
#35
Crisis Chronicles: 300 Years of Financial Crises (1620–1920) James Narron and David Skeie
Demeter
Jul 2013
#15
Ex-official: CIA Helped Jail Mandela By Joseph Albright and Marcia Kunstel, Cox News Service.
Demeter
Jul 2013
#41
What's it going to take to get most Americans in the streets like in Egypt, or Turkey, or Brazil
DemReadingDU
Jul 2013
#60