Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 12 July 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)22. Reining In the Regulators By THE NYT EDITORIAL BOARD
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/06/opinion/reining-in-the-regulators.html?_r=1&
For all its rabid partisanship, Congress has shown time and again that it is willing to come together to deregulate corporate America. The latest example is a new bill in the Senate that would effectively end the independence of independent regulatory agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the National Labor Relations Board. Introduced by Republicans Rob Portman and Susan Collins and Democrat Mark Warner, the measure, if enacted, would scotch any remaining hope for putting the Dodd-Frank financial reform law fully into practice anytime soon if ever. In the long run, it would benefit powerful corporate interests over investor protection, consumer health and safety and basic fairness.
Unlike cabinet departments and executive agencies, independent agencies do not report to the White House. They are overseen by Congress, which deemed them independent to insulate them from pressure by the executive branch and to keep them focused on their public missions. The Senate bill, called the Independent Agency Regulatory Analysis Act of 2013, would require such agencies to submit all significant draft rules to the White House for review. The stated goal is to ensure that new rules appropriately balance costs and benefits. In reality, White House review, first established in 1980 to vet draft regulations from executive agencies, has long proved to be an obstacle to timely and strong regulation. The review process often adds lengthy delays to already arduous rule-making procedures, in large part because corporations use it as an opportunity to lobby for favorable treatment. It is opaque and also politicized, as shown most recently by the Obama administration in 2012, when it delayed important rules in an attempt to coddle industry and avoid Republican criticism in an election year, creating a regulatory backlog that persists to this day.
Subjecting independent agencies to executive regulatory review would not improve the rule-making process, but it would ensure that ostensibly regulated industries are as unregulated and deregulated as possible...There is no question that making independent agencies less independent is a bad idea. The question is whether Congressional Democrats and administration officials will join forces to kill the measure.
For all its rabid partisanship, Congress has shown time and again that it is willing to come together to deregulate corporate America. The latest example is a new bill in the Senate that would effectively end the independence of independent regulatory agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the National Labor Relations Board. Introduced by Republicans Rob Portman and Susan Collins and Democrat Mark Warner, the measure, if enacted, would scotch any remaining hope for putting the Dodd-Frank financial reform law fully into practice anytime soon if ever. In the long run, it would benefit powerful corporate interests over investor protection, consumer health and safety and basic fairness.
Unlike cabinet departments and executive agencies, independent agencies do not report to the White House. They are overseen by Congress, which deemed them independent to insulate them from pressure by the executive branch and to keep them focused on their public missions. The Senate bill, called the Independent Agency Regulatory Analysis Act of 2013, would require such agencies to submit all significant draft rules to the White House for review. The stated goal is to ensure that new rules appropriately balance costs and benefits. In reality, White House review, first established in 1980 to vet draft regulations from executive agencies, has long proved to be an obstacle to timely and strong regulation. The review process often adds lengthy delays to already arduous rule-making procedures, in large part because corporations use it as an opportunity to lobby for favorable treatment. It is opaque and also politicized, as shown most recently by the Obama administration in 2012, when it delayed important rules in an attempt to coddle industry and avoid Republican criticism in an election year, creating a regulatory backlog that persists to this day.
Subjecting independent agencies to executive regulatory review would not improve the rule-making process, but it would ensure that ostensibly regulated industries are as unregulated and deregulated as possible...There is no question that making independent agencies less independent is a bad idea. The question is whether Congressional Democrats and administration officials will join forces to kill the measure.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations