Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Tickle the Ivories September 20-22, 2013 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)11. POLLUTION RULE HURTS COAL, HELPS OTHER SOURCES
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_CLIMATE_CHANGE_WINNERS_AND_LOSERS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-09-21-00-03-15
NEW YORK (AP) -- Tough new limits on the amount of heat-trapping emissions new power plants can emit will likely accelerate a shift away from coal-fired power and toward electricity generated with natural gas, wind, and sunshine.
Power prices for homes, businesses and factories may eventually rise, and nuclear power could return to fashion.
The rule proposed by the Obama administration Friday will have little effect on the mix of power sources and electricity prices anytime soon because it only applies to new power plants and is likely to be challenged in court. Even so, market forces are already reshaping power markets in the same way the rule will. A boom in natural gas production in the U.S. has dramatically increased supplies, sent prices plummeting and prompted a shift away from coal.
The rule requires new coal plants to be built with extremely expensive equipment to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. That will make coal look prohibitively expensive to regulators and utilities planning for the future. By comparison, natural gas-fired plants, which emit half as much carbon dioxide as coal plants, along with wind turbines and solar panels, will look like a bargain.
NEW YORK (AP) -- Tough new limits on the amount of heat-trapping emissions new power plants can emit will likely accelerate a shift away from coal-fired power and toward electricity generated with natural gas, wind, and sunshine.
Power prices for homes, businesses and factories may eventually rise, and nuclear power could return to fashion.
The rule proposed by the Obama administration Friday will have little effect on the mix of power sources and electricity prices anytime soon because it only applies to new power plants and is likely to be challenged in court. Even so, market forces are already reshaping power markets in the same way the rule will. A boom in natural gas production in the U.S. has dramatically increased supplies, sent prices plummeting and prompted a shift away from coal.
The rule requires new coal plants to be built with extremely expensive equipment to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. That will make coal look prohibitively expensive to regulators and utilities planning for the future. By comparison, natural gas-fired plants, which emit half as much carbon dioxide as coal plants, along with wind turbines and solar panels, will look like a bargain.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How Detroit went broke: The answers may surprise you - and don't blame Coleman Young
Demeter
Sep 2013
#4
Taft-Hartley Plans Have No Legal Way To Be Eligible For Obamacare Subsidies: White House Official
Demeter
Sep 2013
#9
Forbes Calls Goldman CEO Holier Than Mother Teresa By Matt Taibbi (NOT THE ONION)
Demeter
Sep 2013
#22
Robert Prasch: The “Lessons” that Wall Street, Treasury, and the White House Need You to Believe Ab
Demeter
Sep 2013
#23
Different answers to your questions about the momentous Fed decision to delay tapering
Demeter
Sep 2013
#26
7 in 10 Americans Think Government Is For The Banks And Big Corps (Not The People)
Demeter
Sep 2013
#35
Here's A $35 Million Diamond{i'm such a princess - you's think i'd have 1 of those}
xchrom
Sep 2013
#50
artistic and esthetic design must always be the first consideration when wearing
xchrom
Sep 2013
#57