Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Tickle the Ivories September 20-22, 2013 [View all]jtuck004
(15,882 posts)39. Lest We Forget: Why We Had A Financial Crisis
It is clear to anyone who has studied the financial crisis of 2008 that the private sectors drive for short-term profit was behind it. More than 84 percent of the sub-prime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending. These private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year. Out of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006, only one was subject to the usual mortgage laws and regulations. The nonbank underwriters made more than 12 million subprime mortgages with a value of nearly $2 trillion. The lenders who made these were exempt from federal regulations.
...
Even this morning, November 22, 2011, a seemingly smart guy like Joe Kernan was saying on CNBCs Squawkbox, When the losses at Fannie and Freddie reach $200 billion how can the deniers say that Fannie and Freddie were enablers for a lot of the housing crisis. When it gets up to that levels, how can they say that they were only into sub-prime late, and they were only in it a little bit?
The reason that people can say that is because it is true. The $200 billion was a mere drop in the ocean of derivatives which in 2007 amounted to three times the size of the entire global economy. When the countrys leaders start promulgating obvious nonsense as the truth, and the Big Lie starts to go viral, then we know that we are laying the groundwork for yet another, even-bigger financial crisis.
...
The SEC loosened capital requirements: In 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission changed the leverage rules for just five Wall Street banks. This exemption replaced the 1977 net capitalization rules 12-to-1 leverage limit. This allowed unlimited leverage for Goldman Sachs [GS], Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America [BAC]), Lehman Brothers (now defunct) and Bear Stearns (now part of JPMorganChase[JPM]). These banks ramped leverage to 20-, 30-, even 40-to-1. Extreme leverage left little room for error. By 2008, only two of the five banks had survived, and those two did so with the help of the bailout.
...
Facts are such pesky little critters...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How Detroit went broke: The answers may surprise you - and don't blame Coleman Young
Demeter
Sep 2013
#4
Taft-Hartley Plans Have No Legal Way To Be Eligible For Obamacare Subsidies: White House Official
Demeter
Sep 2013
#9
Forbes Calls Goldman CEO Holier Than Mother Teresa By Matt Taibbi (NOT THE ONION)
Demeter
Sep 2013
#22
Robert Prasch: The “Lessons” that Wall Street, Treasury, and the White House Need You to Believe Ab
Demeter
Sep 2013
#23
Different answers to your questions about the momentous Fed decision to delay tapering
Demeter
Sep 2013
#26
7 in 10 Americans Think Government Is For The Banks And Big Corps (Not The People)
Demeter
Sep 2013
#35
Here's A $35 Million Diamond{i'm such a princess - you's think i'd have 1 of those}
xchrom
Sep 2013
#50
artistic and esthetic design must always be the first consideration when wearing
xchrom
Sep 2013
#57