Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 1 November 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)43. IRS hamstrung on collecting health law penalties
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/29/irs-hamstrung-on-collecting-health-law-penalties/3310355/
Congress banned the IRS from using any of its usual techniques to force people to pay the penalty for failing to obtain health insurance.
WELL, THAT'S ALL RIGHT, THEN. (HOW DO YOU LIKE MY JON STEWART IMITATION?)
The Internal Revenue Service probably will bark at you if you fail to obtain health insurance next year, but the agency won't have much bite. On this issue, Congress pulled the watchdog's teeth. The Affordable Care Act declares that most Americans will face a penalty if they're uninsured, starting in 2014. But experts predict the government will have a tough time forcing people to pay up. The IRS could deduct the penalty amount from any tax refund you're due. But what if you're not due a tax refund?
"They might send you a sternly worded letter," said Andy Grewal, a University of Iowa law professor who specializes in tax issues. And if you toss the IRS' hectoring note into the recycling bin, you should brace yourself for, um, another sternly worded letter. Much has been made about the fact that the penalty for failing to obtain health insurance next year is set at just $95 or 1 percent of a person's income. (That amount is set to rise substantially in subsequent years, but it will remain less than the premiums on many insurance policies.) However, relatively few people know that the Affordable Care Act hamstrings the government's ability to collect the penalties.
The IRS, which is in charge of enforcing compliance with the new insurance requirement, is accustomed to carrying big sticks. The first step it usually takes against tax scofflaws is to file public liens against them. Such a lien means the IRS has first dibs on any money you acquire, Grewal said.
"It puts a cloud over all your assets," he said. "If there's a public record that the IRS is after you, no one's going to lend you money."
That means no mortgage, no car loan, no credit cards until you settle up with Uncle Sam.
Grewal said liens are usually enough to bring tax deadbeats to heel. If not, the IRS can seize assets, including your car or your house. And in extreme cases, if you willfully refuse to pay taxes, authorities can charge you criminally, put you on trial and send you to prison.
But when it passed the Affordable Care Act in 2010, Congress banned the IRS from using any of its usual techniques to force people to pay the penalty for failing to obtain health insurance.
Alice Helle, a Des Moines lawyer who has been working on Affordable Care Act issues, speculated that members of Congress had political motives for disarming the IRS on this issue.
"I think they thought, 'We're not going to throw people in jail or put a lien on their house for not having coverage,'" she said.
DAMN RIGHT THEY AREN'T!
MORE AMUSEMENT AT LINK
Congress banned the IRS from using any of its usual techniques to force people to pay the penalty for failing to obtain health insurance.
WELL, THAT'S ALL RIGHT, THEN. (HOW DO YOU LIKE MY JON STEWART IMITATION?)
The Internal Revenue Service probably will bark at you if you fail to obtain health insurance next year, but the agency won't have much bite. On this issue, Congress pulled the watchdog's teeth. The Affordable Care Act declares that most Americans will face a penalty if they're uninsured, starting in 2014. But experts predict the government will have a tough time forcing people to pay up. The IRS could deduct the penalty amount from any tax refund you're due. But what if you're not due a tax refund?
"They might send you a sternly worded letter," said Andy Grewal, a University of Iowa law professor who specializes in tax issues. And if you toss the IRS' hectoring note into the recycling bin, you should brace yourself for, um, another sternly worded letter. Much has been made about the fact that the penalty for failing to obtain health insurance next year is set at just $95 or 1 percent of a person's income. (That amount is set to rise substantially in subsequent years, but it will remain less than the premiums on many insurance policies.) However, relatively few people know that the Affordable Care Act hamstrings the government's ability to collect the penalties.
The IRS, which is in charge of enforcing compliance with the new insurance requirement, is accustomed to carrying big sticks. The first step it usually takes against tax scofflaws is to file public liens against them. Such a lien means the IRS has first dibs on any money you acquire, Grewal said.
"It puts a cloud over all your assets," he said. "If there's a public record that the IRS is after you, no one's going to lend you money."
That means no mortgage, no car loan, no credit cards until you settle up with Uncle Sam.
Grewal said liens are usually enough to bring tax deadbeats to heel. If not, the IRS can seize assets, including your car or your house. And in extreme cases, if you willfully refuse to pay taxes, authorities can charge you criminally, put you on trial and send you to prison.
But when it passed the Affordable Care Act in 2010, Congress banned the IRS from using any of its usual techniques to force people to pay the penalty for failing to obtain health insurance.
Alice Helle, a Des Moines lawyer who has been working on Affordable Care Act issues, speculated that members of Congress had political motives for disarming the IRS on this issue.
"I think they thought, 'We're not going to throw people in jail or put a lien on their house for not having coverage,'" she said.
DAMN RIGHT THEY AREN'T!
MORE AMUSEMENT AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DHS, NSA Threaten to Sue Man for Selling "Department of Homeland Stupidity" T-Shirts. Coffee Mugs
Demeter
Oct 2013
#9
Having Beaten Off the Gringos, Brazil isn't likely to fall to Chinese Blandishments or Bribes
Demeter
Nov 2013
#14
On the other hand, it's hard to support democracy when you're constantly on the move
Demeter
Nov 2013
#15
indeed. it's jobs first -- and as another duer pointed out -- many households have 2 people
xchrom
Nov 2013
#17
Or is it because the way we typically choose to increase home ownership is through
jtuck004
Nov 2013
#57
Obamacare: The Biggest Insurance Scam in History By Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers
Demeter
Nov 2013
#22