How Can the New York Times Endorse an Agreement the Public Can't Read?

[rhett o rick]

37. If "they" have moved anywhere it's toward the right.

Seems to me like they try to equate the crazy left that are outraged that American children go to bed hungry with the right that's outraged that slavery isnt the way of the land. They try to say it's pragmatic to accept the fact that some American children go hungry.

You say, "They never have anything of substance to say, they only reason they are on here is to be snarky." Yes some oh "them" are here to try to justify their denial. They want to follow someone blindly because it's so much easier. Less thinking involved. Less decision making. They lash out at those that dare question their authoritarian leaders. This group hates conspiracy talk. They are afraid to learn that anyone is conspiring. It hurts their comfortable denial bubbles.