Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 17 March 2014 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)3. How Finance Gutted Manufacturing
http://www.bostonreview.net/forum/suzanne-berger-how-finance-gutted-manufacturing
In May 2013 shareholders voted to break up the Timken Companya $5 billion Ohio manufacturer of tapered bearings, power transmissions, gears, and specialty steelinto two separate businesses. Their goal was to raise stock prices. The company, which makes complex and difficult products that cannot be easily outsourced, employs 20,000 people in the United States, China, and Romania. Ward Tim Timken, Jr., the Timken chairman whose family founded the business more than a hundred years ago, and James Griffith, Timkens CEO, opposed the move.
The shareholders who supported the breakup hardly looked like the barbarians at the gate who forced the 1988 leveraged buyout of RJR Nabisco. This time the attack came from the California State Teachers Retirement System pension fund, the second-largest public pension fund in the United States, together with Relational Investors LLC, an asset management firm. And Tim Timken was not, like the RJR Nabisco CEO, eagerly pursuing the breakup to raise his own take. But beneath these differences are the same financial pressures that have shaped corporate structure for thirty years.
Urging Timken shareholders to vote for the split, Relational Investors argued that they should want pure-play companies, focused on a single industrial activity. Investors would then be free to balance their portfolios by selecting businesses in industrial sectors with varying degrees of risk and sensitivity to different phases of economic cycles. A firm such as Timkenabout one-third a steel company (a materials play) and about two-thirds a bearings and power transmission business (an industrial components play)would lock investors into a mix that, Relational Investors claimed, leads to a discount on share price.
Timken management argued that making both materials and products enabled them to bring to market higher-quality goods that met customers needs: for example, their ultra-large bearings for windmill towers, which measure two meters in diameter, weigh four tons, and have to stand up to extreme wind and temperature conditions. Controlling the entire value chain, they said, allowed them to fine-tune the attributes of the steel in order to make superior products. Nonetheless, the financial calculation about how to maximize quarterly returns won out....
Since the 1980s, financial market pressures have driven companies to hive off activities that sustained manufacturing.
In May 2013 shareholders voted to break up the Timken Companya $5 billion Ohio manufacturer of tapered bearings, power transmissions, gears, and specialty steelinto two separate businesses. Their goal was to raise stock prices. The company, which makes complex and difficult products that cannot be easily outsourced, employs 20,000 people in the United States, China, and Romania. Ward Tim Timken, Jr., the Timken chairman whose family founded the business more than a hundred years ago, and James Griffith, Timkens CEO, opposed the move.
The shareholders who supported the breakup hardly looked like the barbarians at the gate who forced the 1988 leveraged buyout of RJR Nabisco. This time the attack came from the California State Teachers Retirement System pension fund, the second-largest public pension fund in the United States, together with Relational Investors LLC, an asset management firm. And Tim Timken was not, like the RJR Nabisco CEO, eagerly pursuing the breakup to raise his own take. But beneath these differences are the same financial pressures that have shaped corporate structure for thirty years.
Urging Timken shareholders to vote for the split, Relational Investors argued that they should want pure-play companies, focused on a single industrial activity. Investors would then be free to balance their portfolios by selecting businesses in industrial sectors with varying degrees of risk and sensitivity to different phases of economic cycles. A firm such as Timkenabout one-third a steel company (a materials play) and about two-thirds a bearings and power transmission business (an industrial components play)would lock investors into a mix that, Relational Investors claimed, leads to a discount on share price.
Timken management argued that making both materials and products enabled them to bring to market higher-quality goods that met customers needs: for example, their ultra-large bearings for windmill towers, which measure two meters in diameter, weigh four tons, and have to stand up to extreme wind and temperature conditions. Controlling the entire value chain, they said, allowed them to fine-tune the attributes of the steel in order to make superior products. Nonetheless, the financial calculation about how to maximize quarterly returns won out....
Since the 1980s, financial market pressures have driven companies to hive off activities that sustained manufacturing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Interesting roadmap on how to kill off a country. Bascially, take the companies that
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#10
Consortium News article (top) repost at theecologist via gmwatch link.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2014
#33