Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 5 June 2014 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)21. BNP Paribas Fine Seen Eclipsing Past U.S. Sanctions Cases
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-05/bnp-paribas-fine-seen-eclipsing-past-u-s-sanctions-cases.html
BNP Paribas SA (BNP)s settlement talks with the U.S. over sanctions violations have headed out of the ballpark, compared with previous punishments levied by the Obama administration in such cases.
The U.S. has been said to seek more than $5 billion or even $10 billion during talks in the past month -- a penalty higher than the combined $4.9 billion levied against 21 other banks for transactions tied to sanctioned countries since President Barack Obama took office.
An accord of such a magnitude, described by people familiar with the talks, would eclipse BP Plcs (BP/) record $4 billion settlement of criminal allegations last year. Prosecutors are pressuring the BNP Paribas parent company to plead guilty to moving funds for clients in violation of sanctions against Sudan, Iran and Cuba, the people have said, asking not to be identified because the negotiations are confidential.
I think law enforcement is seeing that a $1 billion, $2 billion or $3 billion fine is not necessarily material or fatal to these organizations, James Odell, a former general counsel at a UBS AG unit, said in an interview. If the number is seen as insignificant, theres going to be a lot of backlash.
BNP Paribas SA (BNP)s settlement talks with the U.S. over sanctions violations have headed out of the ballpark, compared with previous punishments levied by the Obama administration in such cases.
The U.S. has been said to seek more than $5 billion or even $10 billion during talks in the past month -- a penalty higher than the combined $4.9 billion levied against 21 other banks for transactions tied to sanctioned countries since President Barack Obama took office.
An accord of such a magnitude, described by people familiar with the talks, would eclipse BP Plcs (BP/) record $4 billion settlement of criminal allegations last year. Prosecutors are pressuring the BNP Paribas parent company to plead guilty to moving funds for clients in violation of sanctions against Sudan, Iran and Cuba, the people have said, asking not to be identified because the negotiations are confidential.
I think law enforcement is seeing that a $1 billion, $2 billion or $3 billion fine is not necessarily material or fatal to these organizations, James Odell, a former general counsel at a UBS AG unit, said in an interview. If the number is seen as insignificant, theres going to be a lot of backlash.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Don’t believe brokers, government, or Piketty: property values won’t grow faster than paychecks
Demeter
Jun 2014
#2
"Maybe he'll even get to the point about how money differs from actual wealth."
Tansy_Gold
Jun 2014
#37
5 Reasons The Deficit Has Fallen By Nearly $5 Trillion (And Why That’s A Bad Thing)
Demeter
Jun 2014
#6
" get(ting) people who had dropped out of the workforce to restart their job hunts"
Demeter
Jun 2014
#28