Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 10 July 2014 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)5. Maine Supreme Court Hands Major Defeat to MERS Mortgage Registry
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/07/maine-supreme-court-hands-major-defeat-mers-mortgage-registry.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
Yesterday, we wrote about a major loss by the electronic mortgage registry, MERS, in a major Federal court case in Pennsylvania. MERS suffered an additional blow via an important adverse decision in the Maine Supreme Court, against Tom Cox, the attorney who first made robosigning a national issue.
Because mortgage abuses have faded from national headlines, some readers may not be familiar with MERS. MERS was created to replace the system of local recording of mortgages. While such an idea could have had merit (for instance, Australia has a national mortgage registry that by all accounts works well), MERS was designed for the convenience of banks and mortgage securitizers, with no review of how it would work with well-established real estate law in 50 states. MERS is a classic example of what Lambert calls code as law where computer systems are put in place and contracts and legal precedents are expected to conform to the dictates of often-not-well-enough-designed innovations. And even worse, in the case of MERS, the database protocols fall shockingly short of well-established norms for information integrity and security.
It is important to remember that with over 60 million mortgages in MERS, the records that show ownership and liens against many Americans biggest asset are in serious doubt. Yet astonishingly, MERS has been able to maintain a facade of legitimacy, mainly by settling cases that looked to pose a threat to its operations. However, a few important challenges have crept through. One was a case filed on behalf of all Pennsylvania county recorders. If it survives appeal, it will deal a fatal blow to the use of MERS in that state, will almost certainly result in large damages, and will have serious ramifications in other so-called title theory states.
The Maine victory by Thomas Cox is more decisive, in that MERS has no where to go in Maine after losing in the Supreme Court. Its full ramifications are not fully clear, however. Weve embedded the ruling below...SEE LINK FOR MORE
Yesterday, we wrote about a major loss by the electronic mortgage registry, MERS, in a major Federal court case in Pennsylvania. MERS suffered an additional blow via an important adverse decision in the Maine Supreme Court, against Tom Cox, the attorney who first made robosigning a national issue.
Because mortgage abuses have faded from national headlines, some readers may not be familiar with MERS. MERS was created to replace the system of local recording of mortgages. While such an idea could have had merit (for instance, Australia has a national mortgage registry that by all accounts works well), MERS was designed for the convenience of banks and mortgage securitizers, with no review of how it would work with well-established real estate law in 50 states. MERS is a classic example of what Lambert calls code as law where computer systems are put in place and contracts and legal precedents are expected to conform to the dictates of often-not-well-enough-designed innovations. And even worse, in the case of MERS, the database protocols fall shockingly short of well-established norms for information integrity and security.
It is important to remember that with over 60 million mortgages in MERS, the records that show ownership and liens against many Americans biggest asset are in serious doubt. Yet astonishingly, MERS has been able to maintain a facade of legitimacy, mainly by settling cases that looked to pose a threat to its operations. However, a few important challenges have crept through. One was a case filed on behalf of all Pennsylvania county recorders. If it survives appeal, it will deal a fatal blow to the use of MERS in that state, will almost certainly result in large damages, and will have serious ramifications in other so-called title theory states.
The Maine victory by Thomas Cox is more decisive, in that MERS has no where to go in Maine after losing in the Supreme Court. Its full ramifications are not fully clear, however. Weve embedded the ruling below...SEE LINK FOR MORE
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations