Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 30 October 2014 [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)17. Here's Why You Don't See Skyrocketing Out-Of-Pocket Medical Costs In The CPI Numbers
http://www.businessinsider.com/inflation-numbers-dont-capture-skyrocketing-medical-costs-2014-10
Medical costs rose at an official rate of 1.7% year on year this past September, but the average increase in medical expenses individuals actually paid could easily be far larger. Most importantly, the CPI, as a pure price index, may not reflect the increased cost of living for families who lose employer paid health care coverage. Thats an all too common predicament, given the substantial fraction of part-time jobs created during the current economic recovery.
Nor does the CPI make it easy to see how reduced healthcare benefits raise the cost of living for those who still enjoy employer sponsored plans. As Aflac reports, 56% of employers offering health plans hiked the employees share of premiums or copays in 2013, and 59% expected to do so in 2014. Furthermore, the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare) encourages this sort of cost shifting from employer to employee through its 40% excise taxon Cadillac plans.
The BLS does not measure insurance costs directly when compiling CPI-MED, the CPIs health care component (h/t Doug Short). Instead BLS assumes that insurance costs rise commensurately with the prices of medical goods and services, plus or minus a margin for profit and administrative costs. Since CPI-MED measures changes in medical prices faced by consumers, it calculates changes in net prices charged to consumers after insurers, if any, have paid their share. As individuals and families pay an increased percentage of their healthcare costs, the BLS will account for that by increasing the weight of CPI-MED within the overall CPI; currently CPI-MED accounts for 5.825% of the overall CPI. Increases in the share of medical expense paid by individuals (as opposed to their insurers), will not affect CPI levels.
Therefore, when the BLS re-benchmarks the CPI this coming February, we can probably expect CPI-MED to carry a larger weight than in the past. An increase in the weight would then tell us how much BLS estimates that the average consumers medical care expenses increased as a percent of his or her total expenses.
Read more: http://soberlook.com/2014/10/how-well-does-cpi-measure-individuals.html#ixzz3HcmmNu5d
Read more: http://soberlook.com/2014/10/how-well-does-cpi-measure-individuals.html#ixzz3Hcmdo5pM
Medical costs rose at an official rate of 1.7% year on year this past September, but the average increase in medical expenses individuals actually paid could easily be far larger. Most importantly, the CPI, as a pure price index, may not reflect the increased cost of living for families who lose employer paid health care coverage. Thats an all too common predicament, given the substantial fraction of part-time jobs created during the current economic recovery.
Nor does the CPI make it easy to see how reduced healthcare benefits raise the cost of living for those who still enjoy employer sponsored plans. As Aflac reports, 56% of employers offering health plans hiked the employees share of premiums or copays in 2013, and 59% expected to do so in 2014. Furthermore, the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare) encourages this sort of cost shifting from employer to employee through its 40% excise taxon Cadillac plans.
The BLS does not measure insurance costs directly when compiling CPI-MED, the CPIs health care component (h/t Doug Short). Instead BLS assumes that insurance costs rise commensurately with the prices of medical goods and services, plus or minus a margin for profit and administrative costs. Since CPI-MED measures changes in medical prices faced by consumers, it calculates changes in net prices charged to consumers after insurers, if any, have paid their share. As individuals and families pay an increased percentage of their healthcare costs, the BLS will account for that by increasing the weight of CPI-MED within the overall CPI; currently CPI-MED accounts for 5.825% of the overall CPI. Increases in the share of medical expense paid by individuals (as opposed to their insurers), will not affect CPI levels.
Therefore, when the BLS re-benchmarks the CPI this coming February, we can probably expect CPI-MED to carry a larger weight than in the past. An increase in the weight would then tell us how much BLS estimates that the average consumers medical care expenses increased as a percent of his or her total expenses.
Read more: http://soberlook.com/2014/10/how-well-does-cpi-measure-individuals.html#ixzz3HcmmNu5d
Read more: http://soberlook.com/2014/10/how-well-does-cpi-measure-individuals.html#ixzz3Hcmdo5pM
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm going outside to pick the last roses of summer...48 hours before the snow flies
Demeter
Oct 2014
#6
After 5 Years Of Huddling In The Fetal Position, Companies May Finally Be Starting To Spend
xchrom
Oct 2014
#15
Here's Why You Don't See Skyrocketing Out-Of-Pocket Medical Costs In The CPI Numbers
xchrom
Oct 2014
#17
yeah ... and goddess forfend lowly employees should have "cadillac" plan
bread_and_roses
Oct 2014
#28
ETA News Release: Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (10/30/2014)
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2014
#32