Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 19 November 2014 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)14. Greenberg Absent from AIG Trial, But Government Uses His Words
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/11/18/greenberg-absent-from-aig-trial-but-government-uses-his-words/?mod=yahoo_hs
Maurice R. Hank Greenberg wasnt in court todaybut his words were.
Howard Smith, a former chief financial officer of American International Group Inc. and long-time confidante of Mr. Greenberg, took the stand Tuesday morning as a government witness in the trial for the lawsuit brought by Mr. Greenberg...Mr. Greenberg, who built AIG into a global financial-services powerhouse over nearly four decades, is challenging the lawfulness of the harsh terms of the insurers 2008 government bailout. Both he and Mr. Smith departed the company in 2005 and were large shareholders at the time of the bailout. The 89-year-old Mr. Greenberg is now building another insurance and investment conglomerate, Starr Cos. Mr. Smith is vice chairman of finance at one of Starrs main entities.
In calling Mr. Smith to testify Tuesday, the government appeared to be seeking to use his and Mr. Greenbergs past words to bolster its case that AIG made especially risky moves that got it into trouble. The government cited numerous emails, memos and other communications in 2008 in which the pair mentioned their concern about risky practices at AIG. Mr. Smith, for instance, agreed that he recalled a statement by Mr. Greenberg that AIG management was basically moving the deck chairs around the Titanic. The testimony was aimed at refuting a key part of the case that has been made by Mr. Greenbergs legal team: that AIGs liquidity crisis was caused by the same market forces that hit other financial institutions in 2008, yet banks got relatively generous loan terms while AIG became a political scapegoat.
The government asserts that AIG made risky moves such as selling a type of bond insurance known as credit-default swaps that left the company exposed to huge collateral calls, as well as making risky investments in subprime-mortgage bonds. Among documents cited by Justice Department lawyer Kenneth Dintzer was a memo from Mr. Smith to Mr. Greenberg in summer 2008 that referenced an AIG financial filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission and included this comment from Mr. Smith: It appears that their procedures to mitigate risk in the credit default swaps were a colossal failure!
....................
Mr. Greenberg was on the witness list for the trial, but last Friday evening the government informed his legal team, led by David Boies, that he wouldnt be called this week. The government is seeking to wrap up its presentation of witnesses by Friday. The trial is now in its eighth week. The AIG-bailout lawsuit accuses the government of overstepping its authority in demanding its 79.9% equity stake in exchange for providing an $85 billion emergency loan. Mr. Greenberg asserts the government impeded AIGs efforts to obtain private-sector help as the crisis reached its peak and coerced its board into accepting the bailout. He argues the government then used its control of AIG to funnel money to the companys Wall Street and overseas bank counterparties, fully repaying them in a backdoor bailout rather than negotiating concessions. The government maintains AIGs board voluntarily adopted the bailout package to avoid a bankruptcy filing.
Maurice R. Hank Greenberg wasnt in court todaybut his words were.
Howard Smith, a former chief financial officer of American International Group Inc. and long-time confidante of Mr. Greenberg, took the stand Tuesday morning as a government witness in the trial for the lawsuit brought by Mr. Greenberg...Mr. Greenberg, who built AIG into a global financial-services powerhouse over nearly four decades, is challenging the lawfulness of the harsh terms of the insurers 2008 government bailout. Both he and Mr. Smith departed the company in 2005 and were large shareholders at the time of the bailout. The 89-year-old Mr. Greenberg is now building another insurance and investment conglomerate, Starr Cos. Mr. Smith is vice chairman of finance at one of Starrs main entities.
In calling Mr. Smith to testify Tuesday, the government appeared to be seeking to use his and Mr. Greenbergs past words to bolster its case that AIG made especially risky moves that got it into trouble. The government cited numerous emails, memos and other communications in 2008 in which the pair mentioned their concern about risky practices at AIG. Mr. Smith, for instance, agreed that he recalled a statement by Mr. Greenberg that AIG management was basically moving the deck chairs around the Titanic. The testimony was aimed at refuting a key part of the case that has been made by Mr. Greenbergs legal team: that AIGs liquidity crisis was caused by the same market forces that hit other financial institutions in 2008, yet banks got relatively generous loan terms while AIG became a political scapegoat.
The government asserts that AIG made risky moves such as selling a type of bond insurance known as credit-default swaps that left the company exposed to huge collateral calls, as well as making risky investments in subprime-mortgage bonds. Among documents cited by Justice Department lawyer Kenneth Dintzer was a memo from Mr. Smith to Mr. Greenberg in summer 2008 that referenced an AIG financial filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission and included this comment from Mr. Smith: It appears that their procedures to mitigate risk in the credit default swaps were a colossal failure!
....................
Mr. Greenberg was on the witness list for the trial, but last Friday evening the government informed his legal team, led by David Boies, that he wouldnt be called this week. The government is seeking to wrap up its presentation of witnesses by Friday. The trial is now in its eighth week. The AIG-bailout lawsuit accuses the government of overstepping its authority in demanding its 79.9% equity stake in exchange for providing an $85 billion emergency loan. Mr. Greenberg asserts the government impeded AIGs efforts to obtain private-sector help as the crisis reached its peak and coerced its board into accepting the bailout. He argues the government then used its control of AIG to funnel money to the companys Wall Street and overseas bank counterparties, fully repaying them in a backdoor bailout rather than negotiating concessions. The government maintains AIGs board voluntarily adopted the bailout package to avoid a bankruptcy filing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HUD secretary says housing finance reform remains a top priority for the Obama administration
Demeter
Nov 2014
#7
Oil tumbles anew as Saudi cuts U.S. prices, hikes others FROM NOV. 4 ELECTION DAY
Demeter
Nov 2014
#17
FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF WORLD: Reform of world financial order needs strategic thinking
Demeter
Nov 2014
#27
Singapore Exchange says trade glitch caused by 'ridiculous' power supply problem NOV. 5
Demeter
Nov 2014
#28
George Monbiot: "The Insatiable God", The blind pursuit of economic growth
DemReadingDU
Nov 2014
#37