Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Thanksgiving Leftovers November 29-30, 2014 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)16. Here’s why Democrats couldn’t run on the economy in 2014
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/19/heres-why-democrats-couldnt-run-on-the-economy-in-2014/
...The economy, after all, is what voters almost always say is their top priority. And Democrats had to be heartened to see eight straight months of more than 200,000 jobs created prior to Nov. 4, an unemployment rate dipping below 6 percent, and a thriving stock market.
The economic picture in the homes of Americans, though, was a far different one. In fact, despite progress at the macro level, Americans' views of their own families' economies were basically unchanged -- even from the doldrums of the economic recession. The chart below tells the tale as well as anything we've seen....

You'll notice that one of these lines slopes upward. The other one -- the one that actually matters when it comes to actual votes -- does not.
The macro number (in red) is up to an average of 29 which, while not good, is still better than the single digits in the earliest days of the recession. It's progress. The personal-finance number, though, as of late October, was stuck at an average of 51. Back at the end of 2009, it was 50, and the lowest it ever got was 44. That's not progress...Even Obama, while trying to pump up the economic progress during his presidency, acknowledged this uneasy dichotomy. "They don't feel it," Obama said of the economic progress he believes his Administration had made in a "60 Minutes" interview in late September. "And the reason they don't feel it is because incomes and wages are not going up."
In the end, this was a big reason Democrats didn't have something to run on in 2014. And without a cogent argument for the success of the Obama Administration, their voters were left unmotivated and their candidates were left twisting in the wind.
...The economy, after all, is what voters almost always say is their top priority. And Democrats had to be heartened to see eight straight months of more than 200,000 jobs created prior to Nov. 4, an unemployment rate dipping below 6 percent, and a thriving stock market.
The economic picture in the homes of Americans, though, was a far different one. In fact, despite progress at the macro level, Americans' views of their own families' economies were basically unchanged -- even from the doldrums of the economic recession. The chart below tells the tale as well as anything we've seen....

You'll notice that one of these lines slopes upward. The other one -- the one that actually matters when it comes to actual votes -- does not.
The macro number (in red) is up to an average of 29 which, while not good, is still better than the single digits in the earliest days of the recession. It's progress. The personal-finance number, though, as of late October, was stuck at an average of 51. Back at the end of 2009, it was 50, and the lowest it ever got was 44. That's not progress...Even Obama, while trying to pump up the economic progress during his presidency, acknowledged this uneasy dichotomy. "They don't feel it," Obama said of the economic progress he believes his Administration had made in a "60 Minutes" interview in late September. "And the reason they don't feel it is because incomes and wages are not going up."
In the end, this was a big reason Democrats didn't have something to run on in 2014. And without a cogent argument for the success of the Obama Administration, their voters were left unmotivated and their candidates were left twisting in the wind.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations