Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Ring in the New! New Year 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)5. U.S. agency gives quiet nod to light oil exports
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/30/us-usa-crude-exports-exclusive-idUSKBN0K80SE20141230?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews
The main U.S. export authority is telling some oil companies that they should consider exporting a lightly processed form of crude oil called condensate without formal permission, according to people familiar with the discussions. In conversations that may help clear the way for more overseas sales of U.S. shale oil, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has told companies seeking clarification on the legal status of so-called "processed condensate" that self-classification whereby companies export their product without any formal authorization - could be a way forward, the people told Reuters.
THANK YOU, PENNY PRITZKER---I HOPE WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS ILLEGAL AS HELL AND THAT YOU HANG FOR IT
An official familiar with the law said the agency's discussions did not represent a change in policy since self-classification is allowed under U.S. export controls and is a routine, common practice for the majority of exports. Yet the message, though carefully couched as an informal suggestion, marks the first sign that the administration is becoming comfortable about allowing companies to work around the nations four-decades-old ban on exporting untreated crude oil. Last month, BHP Billiton Ltd (BHP.AX) became the first company to announce it would export lightly processed ultra-light U.S. oil without explicit permission from the government. It said it was on firm legal footing because its product was similar to what the agency had already blessed for other companies in a landmark ruling earlier this year. But until recently, the governments attitude toward the self-classification for crude has been unclear. Officials have repeatedly declined to comment on what has become one of the years most contentious and controversial energy policy topics, beyond saying that it is under review due to the surprising surge in U.S. oil production.
Two other sources told Reuters that the agency has said self-classification may be an expedient option for companies confident their condensate has been adequately processed...In March, the agency told mid-stream firm Enterprise Product Partners (EPD.N) and Pioneer that condensate stabilized and processed through a distillation tower met the legal criteria for exports. Refined fuels and processed oil is not subject to the ban...Texas Congressman Joe Barton earlier this month proposed a bill that would overturn the four-decade old ban and said he would continue to press the issue in the new Republican-led Congress in 2015.
The main U.S. export authority is telling some oil companies that they should consider exporting a lightly processed form of crude oil called condensate without formal permission, according to people familiar with the discussions. In conversations that may help clear the way for more overseas sales of U.S. shale oil, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has told companies seeking clarification on the legal status of so-called "processed condensate" that self-classification whereby companies export their product without any formal authorization - could be a way forward, the people told Reuters.
THANK YOU, PENNY PRITZKER---I HOPE WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS ILLEGAL AS HELL AND THAT YOU HANG FOR IT
An official familiar with the law said the agency's discussions did not represent a change in policy since self-classification is allowed under U.S. export controls and is a routine, common practice for the majority of exports. Yet the message, though carefully couched as an informal suggestion, marks the first sign that the administration is becoming comfortable about allowing companies to work around the nations four-decades-old ban on exporting untreated crude oil. Last month, BHP Billiton Ltd (BHP.AX) became the first company to announce it would export lightly processed ultra-light U.S. oil without explicit permission from the government. It said it was on firm legal footing because its product was similar to what the agency had already blessed for other companies in a landmark ruling earlier this year. But until recently, the governments attitude toward the self-classification for crude has been unclear. Officials have repeatedly declined to comment on what has become one of the years most contentious and controversial energy policy topics, beyond saying that it is under review due to the surprising surge in U.S. oil production.
"I would not characterize BISs position necessarily as one of encouragement, but BIS has made clear that companies should not overlook the option of self-classification," said Theodore Kassinger, a partner at law firm OMelveny & Myers, who had represented oil producer Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD.N) in its dealings with the agency.
Two other sources told Reuters that the agency has said self-classification may be an expedient option for companies confident their condensate has been adequately processed...In March, the agency told mid-stream firm Enterprise Product Partners (EPD.N) and Pioneer that condensate stabilized and processed through a distillation tower met the legal criteria for exports. Refined fuels and processed oil is not subject to the ban...Texas Congressman Joe Barton earlier this month proposed a bill that would overturn the four-decade old ban and said he would continue to press the issue in the new Republican-led Congress in 2015.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jack Lew, Tim Geithner: the treasury's new boss, same as the old boss Charles Ferguson
Demeter
Dec 2014
#3
Guess Which Loan-Sharking Enterprise Helped the 1% Loot Europe After the Global Economic Crisis
Demeter
Dec 2014
#20
Usury Laws Are Dead. Long Live the New Usury Law. The CFPB's Ability to Repay Mortgage Rule
Demeter
Dec 2014
#21
Ukraine PM says he is sure IMF will continue funding, expects no private investment
Demeter
Dec 2014
#22
$300,000 in gold missing from Ukraine Central Bank after swapped for lead bricks
Demeter
Jan 2015
#36
Alternatives To How We Live Now: Le Guin Blasts Fear, Greed and the Profit Motive
bread_and_roses
Jan 2015
#43
AIG Bailout Trial:M. Stanley Told Geithner it Would File for Bankruptcy the Weekend it Became a Bank
Demeter
Jan 2015
#48
Japan's Police Suspect 99% of Mt. Gox Bitcoins Missing from Fraud, Not Transaction Malleability Hack
Demeter
Jan 2015
#49
Thomas Piketty Refuses Big Award: Government Shouldn't 'Decide Who Is Honorable'
Demeter
Jan 2015
#51