Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 19 January 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)14. Robert Reich: The Number-One Way U.S. Workers Are Getting Shafted
http://www.alternet.org/economy/robert-reich-number-one-way-us-workers-are-getting-shafted?akid=12688.227380.QP3OmU&rd=1&src=newsletter1030291&t=8
Insecurity is now baked into every aspect of the employment relationship. Jobs are coming back, but pay isnt. The median wage is still below where it was before the Great Recession. Last month, average pay actually fell. Whats going on? It used to be that as unemployment dropped, employers had to pay more to attract or keep the workers they needed. Thats what happened when I was labor secretary in the late 1990s. It still could happen but the unemployment rate would have to sink far lower than it is today, probably below 4 percent.
Yet theres reason to believe the link between falling unemployment and rising wages has been severed. For one thing, its easier than ever for American employers to get the workers they need at low cost by outsourcing jobs abroad rather than hiking wages at home. Outsourcing can now be done at the click of a computer keyboard. Besides, many workers in developing nations now have access to both the education and the advanced technologies to be as productive as American workers. So CEOs ask, why pay more?
Meanwhile here at home, a whole new generation of smart technologies is taking over jobs that used to be done only by people. Rather than pay higher wages, its cheaper for employers to install more robots. Not even professional work is safe. The combination of advanced sensors, voice recognition, artificial intelligence, big data, text-mining, and pattern-recognition algorithms is even generating smart robots capable of quickly learning human actions.
In addition, millions of Americans who dropped out of the labor market in the Great Recession are still jobless. Theyre not even counted as unemployed because theyve stopped looking for work. But they havent disappeared entirely. Employers know they can fill whatever job openings emerge with this reserve army of the hidden unemployed again, without raising wages. Add to that, todays workers are less economically secure than workers have been since World War II. Nearly one in five is in a part-time job. Insecure workers dont demand higher wages when unemployment drops. Theyre grateful simply to have a job. To make things worse, a majority of Americans have no savings to draw upon if they lose their job. Two-thirds of all workers are living paycheck to paycheck. They wont risk losing a job by asking for higher pay.
Insecurity is now baked into every aspect of the employment relationship. Workers can be fired for any reason, or no reason. And benefits are disappearing. The portion of workers with any pension connected to their job has fallen from over half in 1979 to under 35 percent today. Workers used to be represented by trade unions that used tight labor markets to bargain for higher pay. In the 1950s, more than a third of all private-sector workers belonged to a union. Today, though, fewer than 7 percent of private-sector workers are unionized.
None of these changes has been accidental. The growing use of outsourcing abroad and of labor-replacing technologies, the large reserve of hidden unemployed, the mounting economic insecurities, and the demise of labor unions have been actively pursued by corporations and encouraged by Wall Street. Payrolls are the single biggest cost of business. Lower payrolls mean higher profits. The results have been touted as efficient because, at least in theory, theyve allowed workers to be shifted to higher and better uses. But most havent been shifted. Instead, theyve been shafted.
The human costs of this efficiency have been substantial. Ordinary workers have lost jobs and wages, and many communities have been abandoned. Nor have the efficiency benefits been widely shared. As corporations have steadily weakened their workers bargaining power, the link between productivity and workers income has been severed. Since 1979, the nations productivity has risen 65 percent, but workers median compensation has increased by just 8 percent. Almost all the gains from growth have gone to the top. This is not a winning corporate strategy over the long term because higher returns ultimately depend on more sales, which requires a large and growing middle class with enough purchasing power to buy what can be produced. But from the limited viewpoint of the CEO of a single large firm, or of an investment banker or fund manager on Wall Street, its worked out just fine so far. Low unemployment wont lead to higher pay for most Americans because the key strategy of the nations large corporations and financial sector has been to prevent wages from rising.
And, if you hadnt noticed, the big corporations and Wall Street are calling the shots.
Insecurity is now baked into every aspect of the employment relationship. Jobs are coming back, but pay isnt. The median wage is still below where it was before the Great Recession. Last month, average pay actually fell. Whats going on? It used to be that as unemployment dropped, employers had to pay more to attract or keep the workers they needed. Thats what happened when I was labor secretary in the late 1990s. It still could happen but the unemployment rate would have to sink far lower than it is today, probably below 4 percent.
Yet theres reason to believe the link between falling unemployment and rising wages has been severed. For one thing, its easier than ever for American employers to get the workers they need at low cost by outsourcing jobs abroad rather than hiking wages at home. Outsourcing can now be done at the click of a computer keyboard. Besides, many workers in developing nations now have access to both the education and the advanced technologies to be as productive as American workers. So CEOs ask, why pay more?
Meanwhile here at home, a whole new generation of smart technologies is taking over jobs that used to be done only by people. Rather than pay higher wages, its cheaper for employers to install more robots. Not even professional work is safe. The combination of advanced sensors, voice recognition, artificial intelligence, big data, text-mining, and pattern-recognition algorithms is even generating smart robots capable of quickly learning human actions.
In addition, millions of Americans who dropped out of the labor market in the Great Recession are still jobless. Theyre not even counted as unemployed because theyve stopped looking for work. But they havent disappeared entirely. Employers know they can fill whatever job openings emerge with this reserve army of the hidden unemployed again, without raising wages. Add to that, todays workers are less economically secure than workers have been since World War II. Nearly one in five is in a part-time job. Insecure workers dont demand higher wages when unemployment drops. Theyre grateful simply to have a job. To make things worse, a majority of Americans have no savings to draw upon if they lose their job. Two-thirds of all workers are living paycheck to paycheck. They wont risk losing a job by asking for higher pay.
Insecurity is now baked into every aspect of the employment relationship. Workers can be fired for any reason, or no reason. And benefits are disappearing. The portion of workers with any pension connected to their job has fallen from over half in 1979 to under 35 percent today. Workers used to be represented by trade unions that used tight labor markets to bargain for higher pay. In the 1950s, more than a third of all private-sector workers belonged to a union. Today, though, fewer than 7 percent of private-sector workers are unionized.
None of these changes has been accidental. The growing use of outsourcing abroad and of labor-replacing technologies, the large reserve of hidden unemployed, the mounting economic insecurities, and the demise of labor unions have been actively pursued by corporations and encouraged by Wall Street. Payrolls are the single biggest cost of business. Lower payrolls mean higher profits. The results have been touted as efficient because, at least in theory, theyve allowed workers to be shifted to higher and better uses. But most havent been shifted. Instead, theyve been shafted.
The human costs of this efficiency have been substantial. Ordinary workers have lost jobs and wages, and many communities have been abandoned. Nor have the efficiency benefits been widely shared. As corporations have steadily weakened their workers bargaining power, the link between productivity and workers income has been severed. Since 1979, the nations productivity has risen 65 percent, but workers median compensation has increased by just 8 percent. Almost all the gains from growth have gone to the top. This is not a winning corporate strategy over the long term because higher returns ultimately depend on more sales, which requires a large and growing middle class with enough purchasing power to buy what can be produced. But from the limited viewpoint of the CEO of a single large firm, or of an investment banker or fund manager on Wall Street, its worked out just fine so far. Low unemployment wont lead to higher pay for most Americans because the key strategy of the nations large corporations and financial sector has been to prevent wages from rising.
And, if you hadnt noticed, the big corporations and Wall Street are calling the shots.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oxfam Claims The Richest 1% Will Own More Than Half The World's Wealth By Next Year
xchrom
Jan 2015
#2
I Went To A Talk With Nouriel Roubini And Ian Bremmer, And Now I'm Worried About Everything
xchrom
Jan 2015
#7
oh, there's more..I tried to post as much as possible during the 2008 election. nt
antigop
Jan 2015
#32