Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH - Wednesday, 22 February 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)30. John O’Brien: Mortgage Settlement Fails to Address Banking Criminal Enterprise
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/02/john-obrien-mortgage-settlement-fails-to-address-banking-criminal-enterprise.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
Yves here. The release by San Francisco county assessor-recorder Phil Ting of a study of document irregularities in foreclosures has put a spotlight on the failure of Federal banking regulators and state officials to do anything beyond cursory examinations of servicers bad practices. If a country official with limited resources can show that there are widespread abuses, what is the excuse of state and Federal officials for their failure to understand the depth and severity of these problems?
As Dave Dayen has pointed out, it was two county registers of deeds, Jeff Thigpen in Guiford County, North Carolina, and John OBrien of South Essex County, Massachusettes, who were the first to look at their own records to see how extensive the frauds were. OBrien has called his office a crime scene and refused to register any more fraudulent deeds. He also performed a study of his own, and the results were released in June 2011. As Dayen reported, the study found widespread failures and apparent fraud, just like the later San Francisco exam:
Below, John OBrien gives us his views on the mortgage settlement....SEE LINK
Yves here. The release by San Francisco county assessor-recorder Phil Ting of a study of document irregularities in foreclosures has put a spotlight on the failure of Federal banking regulators and state officials to do anything beyond cursory examinations of servicers bad practices. If a country official with limited resources can show that there are widespread abuses, what is the excuse of state and Federal officials for their failure to understand the depth and severity of these problems?
As Dave Dayen has pointed out, it was two county registers of deeds, Jeff Thigpen in Guiford County, North Carolina, and John OBrien of South Essex County, Massachusettes, who were the first to look at their own records to see how extensive the frauds were. OBrien has called his office a crime scene and refused to register any more fraudulent deeds. He also performed a study of his own, and the results were released in June 2011. As Dayen reported, the study found widespread failures and apparent fraud, just like the later San Francisco exam:
Register John OBrien revealed the results of an independent audit of his registry. The audit, which is released as a legal affidavit was performed by McDonnell Property Analytics, examined assignments of mortgage recorded in the Essex Southern District Registry of Deeds issued to and from JPMorgan Chase Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, and Bank of America during 2010. In total, 565 assignments related to 473 unique mortgages were analyzed.
McDonnells Report includes the following key findings:
Only 16% of assignments of mortgage are valid
75% of assignments of mortgage are invalid.
9% of assignments of mortgage are questionable
27% of the invalid assignments are fraudulent, 35% are robo-signed and 10% violate the Massachusetts Mortgage Fraud Statute.
The identity of financial institutions that are current owners of the mortgages could only be determined for 287 out of 473 (60%)
There are 683 missing assignments for the 287 traced mortgages, representing approximately $180,000 in lost recording fees per 1,000 mortgages whose current ownership can be traced.
McDonnells Report includes the following key findings:
Only 16% of assignments of mortgage are valid
75% of assignments of mortgage are invalid.
9% of assignments of mortgage are questionable
27% of the invalid assignments are fraudulent, 35% are robo-signed and 10% violate the Massachusetts Mortgage Fraud Statute.
The identity of financial institutions that are current owners of the mortgages could only be determined for 287 out of 473 (60%)
There are 683 missing assignments for the 287 traced mortgages, representing approximately $180,000 in lost recording fees per 1,000 mortgages whose current ownership can be traced.
Below, John OBrien gives us his views on the mortgage settlement....SEE LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Scandal: Greece To Receive "Negative" Cash From "Second Bailout" As It Funds Insolvent European Bank
girl gone mad
Feb 2012
#61
"...beginning this month some Greeks will have to pay for the privilege of having a job."
girl gone mad
Feb 2012
#62
If your daughter ever calls home and says, "I tried Five Guys", don't get upset!
Fuddnik
Feb 2012
#57