Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Visit Borinquen, La Isla del Encanto May 15-17, 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)23. QE Exit Strategy, Part One: ZIRP
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/05/exit-strategy-part-one-zirp.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
By Perry G. Mehrling, Professor of Economics at Barnard. Originally published at his website
The Fed has announced plans to raise rates in the imminent future, but the market does not believe it. Why not? Conventional wisdom appears to be that the Fed will chicken out, just as it did during the so-called Taper Tantrum. The Fed has signaled its appreciation that liftoff will involve increased volatility, and has stated its resolve this time simply to let that volatility happen, but markets dont believe it...I want to suggest a slightly different source of disconnect, concerning expectations about what exactly will happen in the monetary plumbing when the Fed raises rates. Case in point is the recent Credit Suisse memo, apparently the first of a series, that forecasts a much larger RRP facilitythink north of a trillion whereas the FOMC itself expects that it will be appropriate to reduce the capacity of the RRP facility soon after it commences policy firming. Thats a pretty big disconnect.
Pozsar and Sweeney (authors of the CS memo) think about the exit from ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) from the perspective of wholesale money demand, which they insist is a structural feature of the system and the dominant source of funding in the US money market. Before the crisis, that money demand was funding the shadow banking system, largely through the intermediation of repo dealer balance sheets. Now, it is funding the Feds balance sheet, largely through the intermediation of prime money funds and US bank balance sheets, both of which issue money-like liabilities and invest the proceeds in excess reserves held at the Fed. The big problem that now looms is that neither prime money funds nor banks want that business any more. Capital regulations have made the bank side of the business unprofitable, and looming requirements that prime money funds mark to market (so-called floating NAV rather than constant NAV) will force them out of the business as well. Where is that money demand going to go? Pozsar and Sweeney say it will go directly to the Fed, causing the swelling of the Reverse Repo Facility pari passu with the shrinking of excess reserves. The mechanism will be a shift from prime money funds and bank deposits into government-only money funds, which will absorb the flow by accumulating RRP.
In other words, the Fed will not be able to shrink its balance sheet as part of this first stage of exit from quantitative easing. It will only be able to shift the way that balance sheet is fundedmuch less excess reserves held by banks, much more RRP held by government-only money funds. Nevertheless, because this shift will allow the Fed to regain control over the Fed Funds rate, it will accept that consequence. Exit from ZIRP comes before exit from QE.
Are you with me so far?
NO. I'VE ASKED YVES WHAT RRP IS....
By Perry G. Mehrling, Professor of Economics at Barnard. Originally published at his website
The Fed has announced plans to raise rates in the imminent future, but the market does not believe it. Why not? Conventional wisdom appears to be that the Fed will chicken out, just as it did during the so-called Taper Tantrum. The Fed has signaled its appreciation that liftoff will involve increased volatility, and has stated its resolve this time simply to let that volatility happen, but markets dont believe it...I want to suggest a slightly different source of disconnect, concerning expectations about what exactly will happen in the monetary plumbing when the Fed raises rates. Case in point is the recent Credit Suisse memo, apparently the first of a series, that forecasts a much larger RRP facilitythink north of a trillion whereas the FOMC itself expects that it will be appropriate to reduce the capacity of the RRP facility soon after it commences policy firming. Thats a pretty big disconnect.
Pozsar and Sweeney (authors of the CS memo) think about the exit from ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) from the perspective of wholesale money demand, which they insist is a structural feature of the system and the dominant source of funding in the US money market. Before the crisis, that money demand was funding the shadow banking system, largely through the intermediation of repo dealer balance sheets. Now, it is funding the Feds balance sheet, largely through the intermediation of prime money funds and US bank balance sheets, both of which issue money-like liabilities and invest the proceeds in excess reserves held at the Fed. The big problem that now looms is that neither prime money funds nor banks want that business any more. Capital regulations have made the bank side of the business unprofitable, and looming requirements that prime money funds mark to market (so-called floating NAV rather than constant NAV) will force them out of the business as well. Where is that money demand going to go? Pozsar and Sweeney say it will go directly to the Fed, causing the swelling of the Reverse Repo Facility pari passu with the shrinking of excess reserves. The mechanism will be a shift from prime money funds and bank deposits into government-only money funds, which will absorb the flow by accumulating RRP.
In other words, the Fed will not be able to shrink its balance sheet as part of this first stage of exit from quantitative easing. It will only be able to shift the way that balance sheet is fundedmuch less excess reserves held by banks, much more RRP held by government-only money funds. Nevertheless, because this shift will allow the Fed to regain control over the Fed Funds rate, it will accept that consequence. Exit from ZIRP comes before exit from QE.
Are you with me so far?
NO. I'VE ASKED YVES WHAT RRP IS....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weekend Economists Visit Borinquen, La Isla del Encanto May 15-17, 2015 [View all]
Demeter
May 2015
OP
Thom Hartmann on "The Crash of 2016: The Plot to Destroy America—and What We Can Do to Stop It"
Demeter
May 2015
#11
Consumer Confidence Plunges Below Any Economist's Estimate; Consumers Shock Economists
Demeter
May 2015
#30
Court vacates $85 million award for Oregon National Guardsmen in Iraq health case
Demeter
May 2015
#32
New York District Court Denies Immunity To NYPD Officers Who Arrested A Citizen For Filming Them
Demeter
May 2015
#33
World population-food supply balance is becoming increasingly unstable, study finds
MattSh
May 2015
#37
I would strongly recommend running out and buying the June Issue Of Harpers. Must read.
Fuddnik
May 2015
#42
Senate Democrats Work w/GOP Throw Medicare Under Bus as Part of TPP Fast Track Sausage-Making
Demeter
May 2015
#46
Wall Street Just Got More Pessimistic About the U.S. Economy. Will the Fed Follow Suit?
Demeter
May 2015
#48