Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-22/here-s-what-s-really-driving-the-commodity-index-lower
Clearly it hasn’t been commodities’ week, month or year. But focusing on the worst-performers doesn’t tell the full story.
The Bloomberg Commodity Index fell 7.2 percent this month, touching a 13-year low on July 22.
The biggest losers are crops such as coffee and sugar, each down 27 percent. They’ve fallen because of a weak currency in the most important producer, Brazil, and abundant inventories after years of surpluses, according to Commerzbank. (They’re also very weather-driven.)
But those aren’t actually the reasons driving down the whole index. The biggest contributor to the index’s decline has been industrial metals such as copper and nickel, down 12 percent and 23 percent this year, respectively. They’re falling because of concerns that the tumbling Chinese stock market betrays sapping demand from the world’s biggest consumer.
What’s behind the discrepancy? More valuable commodities like oil and gold (down 12 percent and 6.8 percent) have heavier weightings in the index (and most exchange-traded products and other portfolios). As it happens, there’s a lot of overlap between the smallest members and the biggest nominal declines.
Clearly it hasn’t been commodities’ week, month or year. But focusing on the worst-performers doesn’t tell the full story.
The Bloomberg Commodity Index fell 7.2 percent this month, touching a 13-year low on July 22.
The biggest losers are crops such as coffee and sugar, each down 27 percent. They’ve fallen because of a weak currency in the most important producer, Brazil, and abundant inventories after years of surpluses, according to Commerzbank. (They’re also very weather-driven.)
But those aren’t actually the reasons driving down the whole index. The biggest contributor to the index’s decline has been industrial metals such as copper and nickel, down 12 percent and 23 percent this year, respectively. They’re falling because of concerns that the tumbling Chinese stock market betrays sapping demand from the world’s biggest consumer.
What’s behind the discrepancy? More valuable commodities like oil and gold (down 12 percent and 6.8 percent) have heavier weightings in the index (and most exchange-traded products and other portfolios). As it happens, there’s a lot of overlap between the smallest members and the biggest nominal declines.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read