Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 16 September 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)7. Corbynomics 101: A Guide to People’s QE (PQE)—It’s the Deficit, Stupid!
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2015/09/corbynomics-101-its-the-deficit-stupid.html
By Scott Fullwiler, Associate Professor of Economics and James A. Leach Chair in Banking and Monetary Economics at Wartburg College.
As anyone whos followed the discussion has seen, the proposal from the newly-elected leader of the British Labor Party, Jeremy Corbyn, to implement Peoples Quantitative Easing or PQE, has created a lot of controversy (Richard Murphys blog is a good place to see the PQE defense against these arguments). The basics of the proposal are that the government would create a public bank for financing infrastructure (National Investment Bank, or NIB), which the Bank of England (BoE) would then lend to directly in order to fund. The NIB would then carry out infrastructure projects to jumpstart the economy, create public capital, and create jobs.
The proposal obviously counters the austerity mantras going around in British politics (not to mention most other places), though Corbyn himself has paid lip service to balancing the budget, as well. The controversy, beyond the typical concerns with greater government spending of austerians, are fairly predictable for anyone who has taken a standard macroeconomics course (usually with a textbook written by someone who didnt see the financial crisis coming)
So, here I want to look at the accounting and some basic operational realities of this proposal in order to understand how PQE does or does not do what the naysayers say it will. For PQE, consider a NIB that is essentially an arm of the government carrying out its spending, so we can include it as part of the government simply spending from the governments account at the central bank, while its purchases of infrastructure show up as government assets....
By Scott Fullwiler, Associate Professor of Economics and James A. Leach Chair in Banking and Monetary Economics at Wartburg College.
As anyone whos followed the discussion has seen, the proposal from the newly-elected leader of the British Labor Party, Jeremy Corbyn, to implement Peoples Quantitative Easing or PQE, has created a lot of controversy (Richard Murphys blog is a good place to see the PQE defense against these arguments). The basics of the proposal are that the government would create a public bank for financing infrastructure (National Investment Bank, or NIB), which the Bank of England (BoE) would then lend to directly in order to fund. The NIB would then carry out infrastructure projects to jumpstart the economy, create public capital, and create jobs.
The proposal obviously counters the austerity mantras going around in British politics (not to mention most other places), though Corbyn himself has paid lip service to balancing the budget, as well. The controversy, beyond the typical concerns with greater government spending of austerians, are fairly predictable for anyone who has taken a standard macroeconomics course (usually with a textbook written by someone who didnt see the financial crisis coming)
- first, the often heard QE = printing money = massive inflation argument is pervasive here with regard to PQE, as well;
- second, there are substantial concerns being voiced that forcing the BoE to finance the NIB will undermine the independence of the central bank and monetary policy;
- third, PQE gives the government free reign to spend by eliminating the need to fund its deficits in the financial markets.
So, here I want to look at the accounting and some basic operational realities of this proposal in order to understand how PQE does or does not do what the naysayers say it will. For PQE, consider a NIB that is essentially an arm of the government carrying out its spending, so we can include it as part of the government simply spending from the governments account at the central bank, while its purchases of infrastructure show up as government assets....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Second Circuit Rules That Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Protections Protect … Whistleblowers
Demeter
Sep 2015
#5
Lehman Anniversary: A Reminder That the SEC Needs Someone a Lot Better Than Mary Jo White as Chairma
Demeter
Sep 2015
#6
yes, put more on backs of low income seniors so billionaires won't be hit with higher taxes
wordpix
Sep 2015
#28
bne:Chart - Kyiv one of the world's most unliveable cities, survey finds | Business New Europe
MattSh
Sep 2015
#11
Low Unemployment with Falling Capacity Utilization… Not a Good Sign for Fed Liftoff
Demeter
Sep 2015
#26
How Merkel Went From Greek Crisis Pariah to Refugee Crisis Hero ANOTHER VIEWPOINT
Demeter
Sep 2015
#23
Five Charts Show Tough Job Facing Next Greek Prime Minister ELECTION IS SUNDAY!
Demeter
Sep 2015
#25