Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 30 October 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)10. Paul Ryan Won the Right to Do Nothing By Jeffrey Toobin
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/paul-ryan-won-the-right-to-do-nothing
The deal announced on Tuesday between President Obama and congressional leaders will, if approved, keep the government open for the remainder of his term in office and offer modest budget increases in both military and domestic spending. In agreeing to the deal, Speaker John Boehner, who departs his post on Friday, gives his successor, Paul Ryan, a parting gift: the right to do nothing. The deal, in short, makes sure that the government will fulfill its most rudimentary obligations. Federal law-enforcement agents will continue to go to work; food-safety inspectors will keep up their duties; park rangers will keep tourists from falling into Old Faithful, at Yellowstone. The debt ceiling will be lifted, so the governments credit will remain intact. And, because the continuing operations of these functions will be guaranteed through March, 2017, two months into the new Presidents term, the House and Senate will not be compelled to do anything else.
Under normal circumstances, this would hardly be seen as an advantage. Throughout most of its history, Congress did a lot more than pass a budget. It passed laws to address national problemsto guarantee voting rights or expand access to health insurance or reform immigration laws. But the modern Republican Party operates principally as a negative force. It exists to oppose, and regards compromise as surrender. Indeed, it seems likely that the only reason Boehner could agree to this budget deal at all is that his comrades in the G.O.P. have no leverage against himtheyve already forced him out.
In deference to the feelings of a good number of his new constituents (that is, the Freedom Caucus and other radically conservative House Republicans), Ryan pronounced himself disappointed with the deal. I think the process stinks, he said. But it appears that he will vote for it. Still, if the deal does pass (not a sure thing at this point), it will be mostly with Democratic votes in the House, along with a few straggling relics of what used to be called moderate Republicanism. IT PASSED...ON THE BACKS OF DEMOCRATIC VOTES--DEMETER. The bizarre, extreme behavior of the Republicans now in charge of the House of Representatives reveals itself most strikingly in those it has chosen as its principal enemiesBoehner and his counterpart in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, now the Majority Leader. They are hardly what conservatives like to call squishes. As the leader of his party in the Senate, McConnell was best known for this expression of his priorities: The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term President. Likewise, Boehner said the following about his plans for Obamas agenda: Were going to do everythingand I mean everything we can doto kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can. In expressing these views, Boehner and McConnell were channelling the beliefs of their party. Republicans had no higher goals than to defeat Obama and stall his agenda. They failed to stop him from winning in 2012, but they did manage to vote dozens of time to repeal his signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act. In taking all these votes, the Republicans in the House never came up with an alternative to Obamacare, but that was never the point. The point was to opposeendlessly.
The chilling reality, though, is that the new leadership in the House may make Obama and the country regard Boehners reign as the good old days. When he wasnt hurling insults at the President, Boehner did have the temerity to meet with Obama and try to find common ground on a handful of areas, at least on keeping the government open. Mindful of the consequences of Boehners apostasies, Ryans team will probably not make that mistake. And the Republican Presidential candidates? During the debate Wednesday, in Boulder, they were already competing to oppose the budget compromise the loudest, cripple it the most, and, if possible, shred it altogether.
The deal announced on Tuesday between President Obama and congressional leaders will, if approved, keep the government open for the remainder of his term in office and offer modest budget increases in both military and domestic spending. In agreeing to the deal, Speaker John Boehner, who departs his post on Friday, gives his successor, Paul Ryan, a parting gift: the right to do nothing. The deal, in short, makes sure that the government will fulfill its most rudimentary obligations. Federal law-enforcement agents will continue to go to work; food-safety inspectors will keep up their duties; park rangers will keep tourists from falling into Old Faithful, at Yellowstone. The debt ceiling will be lifted, so the governments credit will remain intact. And, because the continuing operations of these functions will be guaranteed through March, 2017, two months into the new Presidents term, the House and Senate will not be compelled to do anything else.
Under normal circumstances, this would hardly be seen as an advantage. Throughout most of its history, Congress did a lot more than pass a budget. It passed laws to address national problemsto guarantee voting rights or expand access to health insurance or reform immigration laws. But the modern Republican Party operates principally as a negative force. It exists to oppose, and regards compromise as surrender. Indeed, it seems likely that the only reason Boehner could agree to this budget deal at all is that his comrades in the G.O.P. have no leverage against himtheyve already forced him out.
In deference to the feelings of a good number of his new constituents (that is, the Freedom Caucus and other radically conservative House Republicans), Ryan pronounced himself disappointed with the deal. I think the process stinks, he said. But it appears that he will vote for it. Still, if the deal does pass (not a sure thing at this point), it will be mostly with Democratic votes in the House, along with a few straggling relics of what used to be called moderate Republicanism. IT PASSED...ON THE BACKS OF DEMOCRATIC VOTES--DEMETER. The bizarre, extreme behavior of the Republicans now in charge of the House of Representatives reveals itself most strikingly in those it has chosen as its principal enemiesBoehner and his counterpart in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, now the Majority Leader. They are hardly what conservatives like to call squishes. As the leader of his party in the Senate, McConnell was best known for this expression of his priorities: The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term President. Likewise, Boehner said the following about his plans for Obamas agenda: Were going to do everythingand I mean everything we can doto kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can. In expressing these views, Boehner and McConnell were channelling the beliefs of their party. Republicans had no higher goals than to defeat Obama and stall his agenda. They failed to stop him from winning in 2012, but they did manage to vote dozens of time to repeal his signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act. In taking all these votes, the Republicans in the House never came up with an alternative to Obamacare, but that was never the point. The point was to opposeendlessly.
The chilling reality, though, is that the new leadership in the House may make Obama and the country regard Boehners reign as the good old days. When he wasnt hurling insults at the President, Boehner did have the temerity to meet with Obama and try to find common ground on a handful of areas, at least on keeping the government open. Mindful of the consequences of Boehners apostasies, Ryans team will probably not make that mistake. And the Republican Presidential candidates? During the debate Wednesday, in Boulder, they were already competing to oppose the budget compromise the loudest, cripple it the most, and, if possible, shred it altogether.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
27 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Malnutrition and 'Victorian' diseases soaring in England 'due to food poverty and cuts'
Demeter
Oct 2015
#6
The Republican Tax Plans Are All Basically Insane: They would cost trillions of dollars.
Demeter
Oct 2015
#8
HALLOWEEN SPECIAL REPORT: Hershey: U.S. Income Inequality Is Transforming The Chocolate Business
Demeter
Oct 2015
#9
Dutch state to sell off ABN Amro in initial public offering (NATIONALIZED BANK)
Demeter
Oct 2015
#11
Winter Scramble; Refugees Will Freeze to Death :Juncker; Tony Blair Apologizes for Creation of ISIS
Demeter
Oct 2015
#13
American Exceptionalism: You can find it everywhere but in the country-comparison statistics
Demeter
Oct 2015
#18