Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Remember Wars that Didn't Have to Be November 6-8, 2015 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)35. Relax: You Won't Be Replaced by a Robot (You'll just have to share your job with one).
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-06/half-of-what-you-do-at-work-could-be-automated-mckinsey-says
Don't think a robot could take your job? A study in the latest issue of McKinsey Quarterly says as many as 45 percent of the tasks that Americans get paid to do could be automated. The share rises to 58 percent if computers get as good as the median human being at speech recognition and understanding.
The study's most depressing finding is that a lot of what people do at work is rote. Just 4 percent of Americans' work activities require creativity at the level a normal person has, and just 29 percent require sensing emotion, the authors conclude. (Though it isn't clear the humans are sensing emotion like crazy, either.)
The study differs from earlier ones on automation by focusing on activities, not occupations. Any given occupation, from landscaper to chief executive officer, involves a set of activities, some of which can be automated and some of which can't, the authors say. "Very few occupations will be automated in their entirety in the near or medium term," they write. "Rather, certain activities are more likely to be automated."
Automation, in other words, will transform occupations, with machines taking over what they do best and people doing more of what they do best, the study says. That sounds like an opportunity for McKinsey & Co., whose consultants presumably would be happy to help companies restructure jobs. The report was written by Michael Chui, a principal at the McKinsey Global Institute, the consulting firm's think tank; James Manyika, a director of the institute; and Mehdi Miremadi, a principal in McKinsey's Chicago office...
YOU MAY SCOFF AT WILL
Don't think a robot could take your job? A study in the latest issue of McKinsey Quarterly says as many as 45 percent of the tasks that Americans get paid to do could be automated. The share rises to 58 percent if computers get as good as the median human being at speech recognition and understanding.
The study's most depressing finding is that a lot of what people do at work is rote. Just 4 percent of Americans' work activities require creativity at the level a normal person has, and just 29 percent require sensing emotion, the authors conclude. (Though it isn't clear the humans are sensing emotion like crazy, either.)
The study differs from earlier ones on automation by focusing on activities, not occupations. Any given occupation, from landscaper to chief executive officer, involves a set of activities, some of which can be automated and some of which can't, the authors say. "Very few occupations will be automated in their entirety in the near or medium term," they write. "Rather, certain activities are more likely to be automated."
Automation, in other words, will transform occupations, with machines taking over what they do best and people doing more of what they do best, the study says. That sounds like an opportunity for McKinsey & Co., whose consultants presumably would be happy to help companies restructure jobs. The report was written by Michael Chui, a principal at the McKinsey Global Institute, the consulting firm's think tank; James Manyika, a director of the institute; and Mehdi Miremadi, a principal in McKinsey's Chicago office...
YOU MAY SCOFF AT WILL
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weekend Economists Remember Wars that Didn't Have to Be November 6-8, 2015 [View all]
Demeter
Nov 2015
OP
Obama’s ‘regime change’ in Syria: effort to destabilize China, Russia? | Asia Times
MattSh
Nov 2015
#4
The West Worried About Russian Escalation and Proxy War in Syria — in 1957 | VICE News
MattSh
Nov 2015
#8
ali ornek on Twitter: "Senior militants killed by #Syria-n Army or its allies since September 30th.
MattSh
Nov 2015
#9
“When cabbage and peas were often our best meal.” A Letter from an 18th Cent Journeyman Cabinetmaker
MattSh
Nov 2015
#5
Relax: You Won't Be Replaced by a Robot (You'll just have to share your job with one).
Demeter
Nov 2015
#35
The Global Test Most Will Fail: Surviving the Bust That Inevitably Follows a Boom
Demeter
Nov 2015
#15
There's a Sliver Sliver of Crescent Moon topped by the Shining Morning Star (Venus)
Demeter
Nov 2015
#16
I know, it's a stupid question, but why have we no songs about Iraq and Afghanistan?
Demeter
Nov 2015
#46
Martin Wolf on the Low Labor Participation as the Result of the Crapification of Jobs
Demeter
Nov 2015
#48
Why Community Banks Are Dropping Like Flies Across America By Ellen Brown / Web of Debt blog
Demeter
Nov 2015
#58
In conclusion of this thread (because the topic never ends, and the inbox overflows)
Demeter
Nov 2015
#65