Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 1 March 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)27. Judge says to rule quickly on CFTC limit rules
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/27/us-financial-regulation-cftc-idUSTRE81Q1KU20120227
A U.S. judge said on Monday he planned to rule quickly on whether to temporarily block controversial new regulations that were adopted by the Obama administration as part of an effort to reduce speculation in the commodities markets. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and groups representing the financial industry clashed in federal court over whether the agency overstepped its bounds by imposing restrictions last year to limit the number of contracts traders can hold in 28-commodities, including oil, coffee and gold.
A lawyer for the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association told the court the regulations would force their members to drastically alter their businesses, cost them tens of millions of dollars, and send customers fleeing. "It's indisputable that these long-term costs will occur," said Eugene Scalia, who argued on behalf of the financial industry. "Customers once lost can't be assumed to come back...That's a very significant cost of this rule," he said. Scalia noted that the CFTC's cost estimate of $50 million to comply with the rule each year was "a bit low" and warned that firms will likely have to shed business to meet the new regulations.
Judge Robert Wilkins of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia spent more than an hour hearing arguments over a motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the financial industry, which argued the regulations limiting the number of commodity futures and swaps contracts a trader could hold were not sufficiently justified...The judge declined to rule directly from the bench on whether to grant an injunction while he considers the merits of the regulations, but said that he "will try to get a ruling out to you as quickly as possible." A ruling could derail the CFTC's plans to gradually implement position limits, which it passed last October. Jonathan Marcus, who argued for the CFTC, said the agency could implement limits for the spot month by June, but the regulator must first finish its swaps definition before it can do so. The final limits for all contract months can only be set a few months after the agency has collected a year's worth of swaps data, a process that is expected to end in August.
The CFTC pinned its support for the new regulations on a 1981 law as well as a requirement from Congress under the 2010 Dodd-Frank law that the agency has argued mandated an expeditious implementation of position limits. "I think that would frustrate Congress' intent. Clearly Congress wanted limits," said Marcus. He told the court the groups failed to meet the threshold for a preliminary injunction saying "there is no way those numbers rise to irreparable harm." MORE
A U.S. judge said on Monday he planned to rule quickly on whether to temporarily block controversial new regulations that were adopted by the Obama administration as part of an effort to reduce speculation in the commodities markets. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and groups representing the financial industry clashed in federal court over whether the agency overstepped its bounds by imposing restrictions last year to limit the number of contracts traders can hold in 28-commodities, including oil, coffee and gold.
A lawyer for the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association told the court the regulations would force their members to drastically alter their businesses, cost them tens of millions of dollars, and send customers fleeing. "It's indisputable that these long-term costs will occur," said Eugene Scalia, who argued on behalf of the financial industry. "Customers once lost can't be assumed to come back...That's a very significant cost of this rule," he said. Scalia noted that the CFTC's cost estimate of $50 million to comply with the rule each year was "a bit low" and warned that firms will likely have to shed business to meet the new regulations.
Judge Robert Wilkins of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia spent more than an hour hearing arguments over a motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the financial industry, which argued the regulations limiting the number of commodity futures and swaps contracts a trader could hold were not sufficiently justified...The judge declined to rule directly from the bench on whether to grant an injunction while he considers the merits of the regulations, but said that he "will try to get a ruling out to you as quickly as possible." A ruling could derail the CFTC's plans to gradually implement position limits, which it passed last October. Jonathan Marcus, who argued for the CFTC, said the agency could implement limits for the spot month by June, but the regulator must first finish its swaps definition before it can do so. The final limits for all contract months can only be set a few months after the agency has collected a year's worth of swaps data, a process that is expected to end in August.
The CFTC pinned its support for the new regulations on a 1981 law as well as a requirement from Congress under the 2010 Dodd-Frank law that the agency has argued mandated an expeditious implementation of position limits. "I think that would frustrate Congress' intent. Clearly Congress wanted limits," said Marcus. He told the court the groups failed to meet the threshold for a preliminary injunction saying "there is no way those numbers rise to irreparable harm." MORE
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lawmakers To The Rescue? Legislation Filed To Fix “Ibanez” Foreclosure Title Defects
Demeter
Mar 2012
#6
Yet Another Mortgage Scam: Homeowners Not Getting Cancelled Notes After Foreclosures
Demeter
Mar 2012
#10
Brace Yourself for Election-Driven Enforcement Theater: Token Roughing Up of Crisis Bad Banksters
Demeter
Mar 2012
#9
RECKONING TIME! S&P Cuts Greece To Selective Default, Cites Collective-Action Clauses
Demeter
Mar 2012
#16