Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,152 posts)
3. Guess it depends on who is saying that and how you define "known"
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 12:52 PM
Dec 2011

since most of the figures are notional, not real.
and most of the figures are counting the derivative exposure, which cannot be known until the banks/funds they are covering explode. You can only have "worse case" and "best case" scenarios..
all of which are in numbers bigger than the entire GDP of the planet anyhow.

I personally like the explanation that this is a game of musical chairs, last bank left standing.
While entire countries swirl down the drain, the banks are in a last ditch effort to grab pension funds, gold supplies, resources, etc.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»The (sizable) Role of Reh...»Reply #3