Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Economy

(28,703 posts)

7. I'm not saying that the courts wouldn't have jurisdiction

Fri May 31, 2019, 02:01 PM

May 2019

Just that the chamber of commerce hasn't stated a legal claim and it isn't obvious to me what it would be.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holy Moly,you mean the Wellstone ruled May 2019 #1

I wonder what their legal claim is FBaggins May 2019 #2

It WAS their job. FBaggins May 2019 #4

Isn't NAFTA a ratified treaty? appal_jack May 2019 #5

I'm not saying that the courts wouldn't have jurisdiction FBaggins May 2019 #7

can Mexico legally "stop"(as demanded) immigration? stopdiggin May 2019 #6