Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
11. I get what you're saying, but
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 04:15 PM
Sep 2014

I'm in no position to confirm it because I don't watch that stuff & am TV-illiterate, although I would consider it a very interesting turn of events if true. Not there's not much we can do about this specific instance, but because one could imagine it to be an early-stage experiment in a new level of message coordination for mind control of the masses through repeating their propaganda.

If this sounds like batshit paranoia to anyone, then they may not know who Edward Bernays was, and what he and some of his peers, including Walter Lippman, thought and did. Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and inventor of modern "public relations"; Lippman, the most-respected editorial voice of the New York Times in the period between the World Wars--Google them.

I certainly do believe that certain privately funded, behind-the-scenes forces in this country could coordinate a collaborative campaign such as you suggest. If they have actually done so, then we are going to be in for a total barrage of coordinated messaging from here on out.

Certainly the labor unions are the most significant source of funds for the Democratic Party, have been a thorn in the side of organized criminals in the suites, and just generally piss off the.001% They are the single biggest source of opposition to the Upper Crust on their path to perfecting of a Randian hell-world. They would be the logical first target.

But hardly the only target. Social Security. ACA. Medicare…in whatever order they choose.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Of course newfie11 Sep 2014 #1
Yes, but that has been the case for a long time. I think this is new. merrily Sep 2014 #2
Yes it is worse now newfie11 Sep 2014 #3
My point is the possibility of a new, concerted, conscious decision among merrily Sep 2014 #4
I have no doubt they've talked newfie11 Sep 2014 #5
Not only wages, but safer working conditions. merrily Sep 2014 #6
I get what you're saying, but Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #11
The "beauty" for the RW of shaming Democrats about merrily Sep 2014 #20
PS On the thread in GD, very few wanted to admit that there might be an actual conspiracy, as in merrily Sep 2014 #21
A predictable response from them. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #22
People who don't want you to know that people are taking concerted action merrily Sep 2014 #23
How many media networks are owned by unions? GeorgeGist Sep 2014 #7
I get who owns msm. But, the general principle that msm works for the merrily Sep 2014 #8
I wish they would support Freespeech TV. Nt newfie11 Sep 2014 #9
I'd rather see them support their own station merrily Sep 2014 #12
In my area ( if there were unions) and there are none that I know of newfie11 Sep 2014 #14
I am not talking about a show. I am talking about an entire station or network merrily Sep 2014 #15
I am talking about the two stations here not a show newfie11 Sep 2014 #16
By not viable, do you mean no one would watch? merrily Sep 2014 #19
You ask a very interesting question. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #10
I don't know the options or the technology, but I know Trinity Broadcasting merrily Sep 2014 #13
I R'd it in both places Omaha Steve Sep 2014 #17
Thanks. Did you happen read Mountain Grammy's post on the GD thread? merrily Sep 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Are mainstream media cons...»Reply #11