Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(47,953 posts)

7. They should replace them with safe, clean Nuclear power

Sun May 1, 2016, 12:26 PM

May 2016

Because nothing ever goes wrong with those and they never need to be replaced.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Handlesblatt: Germany has a big new problem, dealing with its failed wind turbines. [View all] NNadir May 2016 OP

Machines wear out and have to be replaced. Why is that shocking? mackdaddy May 2016 #1

k&r for this response appal_jack May 2016 #2

Precisely Sherman A1 May 2016 #3

Um, um, um... NNadir May 2016 #6

And the fossil fuel inputs required to replace them... Binkie The Clown May 2016 #4

I'm not following the argument Boomer May 2016 #5

They should replace them with safe, clean Nuclear power n2doc May 2016 #7

You are afraid of that, but not automobiles or oil refineries? hunter May 2016 #9

What a bunch of nonsense... Finishline42 May 2016 #10

Um...um...um... NNadir May 2016 #11

Who going to pay for the decommissioning of the nuclear plants in the US? Finishline42 May 2016 #12

Answers to a few of your questions FBaggins May 2016 #13

Thanks for taking the time to reply, but... Finishline42 May 2016 #14

I'm afraid that you're suffering from confirmation bias FBaggins May 2016 #15