Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
19. That's certainly what I see happening.
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:45 PM
May 2016

Extinction is far more probable than a Dyson sphere. There's nothing shameful about extinction, every species goes through it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Practice birth control. haikugal May 2016 #1
Birth control will keep children from dying unnecessarily GliderGuider May 2016 #2
No, my heart goes out to them but at the same time I have no special knowledge or access and haikugal May 2016 #4
Eventually, we will have to go off-planet for our resources. immoderate May 2016 #3
Good luck with that! nt GliderGuider May 2016 #5
Well, I'm not going myself... immoderate May 2016 #7
So where ya gonna go? GliderGuider May 2016 #8
We may very well get extinguished. I (for instance) have no descendants. immoderate May 2016 #9
Why, then, suggest a project requiring orders of magnitude more energy than our current lifestyle? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #13
The OP suggests that our current lifestyle, and ordinary remedies are unsustainable. immoderate May 2016 #15
Are you saying that you don't understand what's so hard about space travel? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #16
I'm suggesting we have not yet reached the epitome of technology. immoderate May 2016 #17
A moment ago you wanted to expend energy in bringing water and raw materials from off earth muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #18
If you think natural resources can't be exhausted, you're covered. immoderate May 2016 #21
No, you're making even less sense as you go along, not more muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #22
So let's start simple. immoderate May 2016 #25
You can't just take energy from something in a different orbit muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #28
The sun has gravity. The asteroids are "above" the earth. immoderate May 2016 #29
No, mechanics doesn't work like that muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #30
This is not about climate change. immoderate May 2016 #32
I've already assumed the rocket is solar or nuclear powered muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #33
Well, asteroids, if nothing else, have "mass to burn." immoderate May 2016 #37
And the point is you have to expend energy to bring asteroids to earth muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #38
You have to aim it 'just right.' immoderate May 2016 #40
It's a reversible process. If you think of what you'd have to do to leave an earth orbit muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #41
Yes, relatively little effort... immoderate May 2016 #42
OK, I think you've finally conceded that mining asteroids is an energy sink muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #43
Thanks for including me in your pigeon hole. immoderate May 2016 #44
'equal and opposite' refers to forces, not energy muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #45
Microwave projectors in space? A bit "third way," doncha think? immoderate May 2016 #46
I think I heard them suggested on a TV documentary about 35 years ago muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #47
IMO, it was a scheme for corporations to retain control over solar energy. immoderate May 2016 #48
Whereas your scheme for towing and mining asteroids would be done by a cooperative muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #49
Don't confuse corporatism with entrepreneurism. immoderate May 2016 #50
There are consumer benefits in energy. muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #51
What is the benefit to consumers of paying for transmission from space? immoderate May 2016 #52
The benefit is that it's a way to get the energy we need muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #53
Why should I pay a utility company to beam down microwaves to maintain EMF on a grid, immoderate May 2016 #55
If someone gives you a solar panel for free, then go for it muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #56
Ordinary remedies are unsustainable, and extraordinary remedies are unachievable. GliderGuider May 2016 #31
OK. So the world will collapse in 30 years, then the population will double in 80? immoderate May 2016 #34
Who has claimed here the population will double in 80 years? NickB79 May 2016 #35
Population increase depends on a functional civilization. GliderGuider May 2016 #36
I had surmised that the earth would not tolerate that number of humans. immoderate May 2016 #39
That can't possibly work Binkie The Clown May 2016 #10
Dyson Sphere? Ring World? Lots of ways. immoderate May 2016 #11
Lots of ways in fantasy land! Binkie The Clown May 2016 #12
So will the population double in 80 years? immoderate May 2016 #14
That's certainly what I see happening. GliderGuider May 2016 #19
Oh, a Dyson sphere doesn't preclude extinction. immoderate May 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author immoderate May 2016 #26
In a word: "Yes" that is exactly what I expect will happen. n/t Binkie The Clown May 2016 #24
I think it will level off. immoderate May 2016 #27
Malthus where is thy sting? pscot May 2016 #23
I'm not sure how the word harm is defined The2ndWheel May 2016 #6
Excellent post.... AuntPatsy May 2016 #54
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Sustainability is destroy...»Reply #19